Definition of 'compatible' operation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mnb96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion defines the concept of compatibility between a binary operation and an equivalence relation within the context of a monoid (M, +). It establishes that the operation + is compatible with the equivalence relation R if the operation on the quotient set M/R can be defined consistently, specifically through the equation [a] +' [b] := [a + b]. This compatibility implies that R is a congruence relation, meaning it maintains the equivalence relation across all operations in the universal algebra. The discussion clarifies that for a monoid, an equivalence relation compatible with the operation + must also be congruent.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of monoids and their properties
  • Familiarity with equivalence relations and congruence relations
  • Knowledge of universal algebra concepts
  • Basic grasp of binary and nullary operations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of congruence relations in universal algebra
  • Explore examples of monoids and their equivalence relations
  • Learn about the implications of compatibility in algebraic structures
  • Investigate the role of operations in defining algebraic systems
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students studying abstract algebra, particularly those interested in the properties of monoids and equivalence relations.

mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hello,
given a monoid (M,+)
I define an equivalence relation R on (M,+)

My question is: what does it mean formally that "the operation + is compatible with the equivalence relation R" ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It means that you can define an operation " +' " on M/R, using the "+" already defined on M by:

[a] +' := [a + b]

Where [x] is the x's equivalence class. Note that you may always "sum" two equivalence classes as above, but when "+" is compatible with R, then the result is independent of the representatives, that is, if:

[a] = [a'], = [b']

Then:

[a] +' = [a'] +' [b'] = [a + b] = [a' + b']
 
Ok! Thanks a lot.
Is that equivalent to say that R must be a congruence relation on (M,+)?
 
Yes.

A congruence relation on a universal algebra is defined to be an equivalence relation that is compatible in a similar sense to the above with each of its operations.

Specifically if \mathcal{A} is a universal algebra with a system of operations \Omega, then an equivalence relation E on \mathcal{A} is a congruence iff
{(\forall\omega\in\Omega)(\forall a_i,a_i'\in\mathcal{A})a_iEa_i'\Rightarrow a_{i_1}a_{i_2}...a_{i_n}\omega E a_{i_1}'a_{i_2}'...a_{i_n}'\omega\text{ where }\omega\text{ is an }n\text{-ary operation.}}
For nullary operations this necessarily follows from the reflexivity of E.

A monoid has a binary operation (+) and a nullary operation (1). From the final remark in the preceding paragraph an equivalence relation that is compatible with + is a congruence.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the explanation!
Now everything is clear.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
959
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
934
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
991
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K