Definition of $S_n$ for Cantor-Schröder-Bernstein Theorem

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the definition of the sequence of sets $S_n$ in the context of the Cantor-Schröder-Bernstein Theorem. The theorem asserts that if two sets $A$ and $B$ are equinumerous with subsets of each other, then they are equinumerous. The sequence is defined recursively with $S_0 = A - g(B)$ and $S_{n+1} = g[f[S_n]]$ for all $n \in \omega$. The union of these sets, $S = \bigcup_{n \in \omega} S_n$, is crucial for constructing a surjective function $h: A \to B$.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of set theory and the concept of equinumerosity.
  • Familiarity with functions, particularly injective and surjective mappings.
  • Knowledge of recursive definitions and sequences in mathematics.
  • Basic comprehension of the Cantor-Schröder-Bernstein Theorem.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Cantor-Schröder-Bernstein Theorem in detail, focusing on its implications in set theory.
  • Explore recursive definitions and their applications in mathematical proofs.
  • Learn about injective and surjective functions, including their properties and examples.
  • Investigate the concept of equinumerosity and its significance in comparing infinite sets.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of set theory, and anyone interested in advanced mathematical concepts related to functions and cardinality will benefit from this discussion.

evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hi! (Smile)

I am looking at the proof of the theorem of Cantor- Schröder-Bernstein, that states the following:

Let $A,B$ be sets. If $A$ is equinumerous with a subset of $B$ and $B$ is equinumerous with a subset of $A$ then $A, B$ are equinumerous. Or equivalently, if $f: A \overset{1-1}{B}$ and $g: B \overset{1-1}{A}$ then there is a $h: A \overset{\text{surjective}}{\to}B$.

Proof:

Let $f: A \overset{1-1}{\to}B$ and $g: B \overset{1-1}{\to}A$.
We define recursively the following sequence of sets:

$$S_0:=A-g(B)\\S_{n+1}=g[f[S_n]]\\ \text{ for all } n \in \omega \\ \dots$$

We define $S:=\bigcup_{n \in \omega} S_n$ and the function $h: A \to B$ as follows:

$$f(x)=x \text{ if } x \in S \\ h(x)=g^{-1}(x) \text{ if } x \in A-S$$
Could you explain me the definition of $S_n$?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
evinda said:
Hi! (Smile)

I am looking at the proof of the theorem of Cantor- Schröder-Bernstein, that states the following:

Let $A,B$ be sets. If $A$ is equinumerous with a subset of $B$ and $B$ is equinumerous with a subset of $A$ then $A, B$ are equinumerous. Or equivalently, if $f: A \overset{1-1}{B}$ and $g: B \overset{1-1}{A}$ then there is a $h: A \overset{\text{surjective}}{\to}B$.

Proof:

Let $f: A \overset{1-1}{\to}B$ and $g: B \overset{1-1}{\to}A$.
We define recursively the following sequence of sets:

$$S_0:=A-g(B)\\S_{n+1}=g[f[S_n]]\\ \text{ for all } n \in \omega \\ \dots$$

We define $S:=\bigcup_{n \in \omega} S_n$ and the function $h: A \to B$ as follows:

$$f(x)=x \text{ if } x \in S \\ h(x)=g^{-1}(x) \text{ if } x \in A-S$$
Could you explain me the definition of $S_n$?
Hi evinda.

You have defined $S_n$ inductively by declaring:

$$S_0:=A-g(B)\\S_{n+1}=g[f[S_n]]\\ \text{ for all } n \in \omega \\ \dots$$

Where exactly are you facing a problem?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K