Definition of Stellar Parallax from Alonso and Finn Volume 1

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the definition of Stellar Parallax as presented in Alonso and Finn's Volume 1, specifically the statement that it is quantified by one-half the angle subtended by the Earth's diameter perpendicular to the line joining the star and the sun. Participants clarify that the definition refers to the angle subtended by the Earth's orbit's diameter, rather than the Earth's physical diameter, as the parallax effect is primarily due to Earth's orbital motion. This distinction is crucial for understanding the geometric interpretation of Stellar Parallax.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic astronomical concepts, including parallax.
  • Familiarity with geometric principles related to angles and triangles.
  • Knowledge of Earth's orbit and its relationship to stellar observations.
  • Ability to interpret diagrams in astronomical texts, such as Figure 2-10.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the geometric derivation of Stellar Parallax using Earth's orbit.
  • Learn about the mathematical formulation of parallax measurements in astronomy.
  • Explore the implications of parallax for distance measurement to stars.
  • Review related concepts in celestial mechanics and observational astronomy.
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of Stellar Parallax and its applications in measuring astronomical distances.

vibha_ganji
Messages
19
Reaction score
6
Hi! I read this definition of Stellar Parallax "It is expressed quantitatively by one-half the angle subtended by the Earth's diameter E1E2 perpendicular to the line joining the star and the sun (see Fig. 2-10)." (Source Alonso and Finn: Volume 1). But, I was unable to understand how they derived this definition. Is there some typo or am I misuderstanding the description? Here is Figure 2-10. (This is not a homework question but rather a doubt I had when I was reading.)

1629511291211.png
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
A definition is just that. It is not derived. You need to clarify your concern.
 
Sorry about that. What I meant was I do not understand how the definition represents the angle theta. When the text writes, “ It is expressed quantitatively by one-half the angle subtended by the Earth's diameter E1E2 perpendicular to the line joining the star and the sun,” do they mean the angle subtended by the Earth’s orbit’s diameter and the line perpendicular to the line joining the star and the sun or do they mean the Earth’s diameter itself?
 
Pretty sure they mean the Earth's orbit's diameter. Hence why they say E1E2.
The diameter of the Earth doesn't make much sense by being here since the parallax is due almost entirely to Earth's orbit.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
28K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K