B Definition of Stellar Parallax from Alonso and Finn Volume 1

AI Thread Summary
The definition of stellar parallax from Alonso and Finn describes it as half the angle subtended by the Earth's diameter perpendicular to the line connecting the star and the sun. There is confusion regarding whether this refers to the Earth's diameter or its orbital diameter. Clarification suggests that it likely pertains to the Earth's orbital diameter, as parallax is primarily influenced by the Earth's orbit. The discussion emphasizes that the definition itself is not derived but rather a statement of the concept. Understanding this distinction is crucial for grasping the definition's implications in astronomy.
vibha_ganji
Messages
19
Reaction score
6
Hi! I read this definition of Stellar Parallax "It is expressed quantitatively by one-half the angle subtended by the Earth's diameter E1E2 perpendicular to the line joining the star and the sun (see Fig. 2-10)." (Source Alonso and Finn: Volume 1). But, I was unable to understand how they derived this definition. Is there some typo or am I misuderstanding the description? Here is Figure 2-10. (This is not a homework question but rather a doubt I had when I was reading.)

1629511291211.png
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
A definition is just that. It is not derived. You need to clarify your concern.
 
Sorry about that. What I meant was I do not understand how the definition represents the angle theta. When the text writes, “ It is expressed quantitatively by one-half the angle subtended by the Earth's diameter E1E2 perpendicular to the line joining the star and the sun,” do they mean the angle subtended by the Earth’s orbit’s diameter and the line perpendicular to the line joining the star and the sun or do they mean the Earth’s diameter itself?
 
Pretty sure they mean the Earth's orbit's diameter. Hence why they say E1E2.
The diameter of the Earth doesn't make much sense by being here since the parallax is due almost entirely to Earth's orbit.
 
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Back
Top