B Definition of Stellar Parallax from Alonso and Finn Volume 1

Click For Summary
The definition of stellar parallax from Alonso and Finn describes it as half the angle subtended by the Earth's diameter perpendicular to the line connecting the star and the sun. There is confusion regarding whether this refers to the Earth's diameter or its orbital diameter. Clarification suggests that it likely pertains to the Earth's orbital diameter, as parallax is primarily influenced by the Earth's orbit. The discussion emphasizes that the definition itself is not derived but rather a statement of the concept. Understanding this distinction is crucial for grasping the definition's implications in astronomy.
vibha_ganji
Messages
19
Reaction score
6
Hi! I read this definition of Stellar Parallax "It is expressed quantitatively by one-half the angle subtended by the Earth's diameter E1E2 perpendicular to the line joining the star and the sun (see Fig. 2-10)." (Source Alonso and Finn: Volume 1). But, I was unable to understand how they derived this definition. Is there some typo or am I misuderstanding the description? Here is Figure 2-10. (This is not a homework question but rather a doubt I had when I was reading.)

1629511291211.png
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
A definition is just that. It is not derived. You need to clarify your concern.
 
Sorry about that. What I meant was I do not understand how the definition represents the angle theta. When the text writes, “ It is expressed quantitatively by one-half the angle subtended by the Earth's diameter E1E2 perpendicular to the line joining the star and the sun,” do they mean the angle subtended by the Earth’s orbit’s diameter and the line perpendicular to the line joining the star and the sun or do they mean the Earth’s diameter itself?
 
Pretty sure they mean the Earth's orbit's diameter. Hence why they say E1E2.
The diameter of the Earth doesn't make much sense by being here since the parallax is due almost entirely to Earth's orbit.
 
Some 8 years ago I posted some experiments using 2 Software Defined Radios slaved to a common clock. The idea was measure small thermal noise by making correlation measurements between the IQ samples from each radio. This is a project that has kinda smoldered in the background where I've made progress in fits and starts. Since most (all?) RA signals are small thermal signals it seemed like the technique should be a natural approach. A recent thread discussing the feasibility of using SDRs to...

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K