Degenerate Perturbation: Calculating Eigenvalues

  • Thread starter Thread starter ergospherical
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvalues
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating corrected eigenvalues in the context of degenerate perturbation theory, specifically involving a Hamiltonian with unperturbed eigenvalues and a perturbation matrix with specific non-zero elements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of a perturbation matrix with certain zero elements and discuss the necessity of higher-order corrections to lift degeneracy. Questions arise regarding the diagonalization process and the validity of applying non-degenerate perturbation theory after a rotation in the degenerate subspace.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants offering insights into the diagonalization process and the potential need for rotations in the degenerate subspace. There is no explicit consensus yet, as different approaches and interpretations are being considered.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the constraints of the perturbation matrix and the implications of zero matrix elements on the calculation of eigenvalues. The discussion reflects the complexities inherent in applying perturbation theory in degenerate cases.

ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
Homework Statement
See below
Relevant Equations
N/A
Say a model hamiltonian with unperturbed eigenvalues E1 and E2 = E3 is subjected to a perturbation V such that V12 = V21 = x and V13 = V31 = x2, with all other elements zero. I'm having trouble calculating the corrected eigenvalues. In the degenerate subspace spanned by |2> and |3> I need to diagonalise V, but all of these matrix elements are zero?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It sounds like the first-order correction is zero, and you'll need to go to higher orders to lift the degeneracy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrClaude
If I understand you correctly, you have a perturbed matrix of the form $$H=\begin{pmatrix}
E_1 & V_{12} & V_{13} \\
V_{12}& E_2 & 0 \\
V_{13} & 0 & E_2
\end{pmatrix}.$$Why can you not diagonalize the usual way? Just say$$\det\begin{bmatrix}
E_1-\lambda & V_{12} & V_{13} \\
V_{12}& E_2-\lambda & 0 \\
V_{13} & 0 & E_2-\lambda
\end{bmatrix}=0$$ and solve the characteristic equation. That is easy to do because it factors into ##(E_2-\lambda)## times a quadratic in ##\lambda.## You get three non-degenerate eigenvalues.
 
First of all, there is no reason not to make a rotation in the degenerate subspace such that ##V_{13} = 0##. After that rotation it should be clear that ##E_2## is still an eigenvalue for one state. You can then apply non-degenerate perturbation theory to the remaining 2-dimensional subspace.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
12K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K