Degree to pursue if interested in imaging

  • Context: Programs 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kekekekek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Degree Imaging
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the considerations for pursuing a graduate degree related to imaging, particularly in the context of medical imaging and the potential career opportunities in medical physics versus electrical engineering (EE) or physics optics. Participants explore various educational paths and their implications for future employment in the field.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about saturation in the field of medical physics and questions whether a degree in EE or physics optics might offer better career opportunities.
  • Another participant suggests that a background in EE, particularly with a focus on digital signal processing (DSP), could provide a strong foundation for advanced image processing classes and applications in medical imaging.
  • There is a recommendation to consider medical physics graduate programs with strong diagnostic imaging or MRI components, as clinical opportunities may be more favorable than academic ones.
  • A participant raises a question about the difficulty of finding a job in medical imaging and compares the accessibility of medical physics to academia, noting the challenges in securing academic positions.
  • One participant, identifying as a radiation oncology physicist, provides insights into the job market, mentioning that clinical positions may offer a mix of responsibilities and that the residency matching process for medical physics could influence job prospects.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the best educational path and the job market in medical imaging. There is no consensus on the relative ease of entering medical physics compared to academia, and the discussion reflects differing perspectives on career opportunities in the field.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the complexity of job markets in clinical versus academic settings and the variability in residency matching statistics, which may depend on specific specialties within medical physics.

kekekekek
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm a senior physics major, and I'm starting to look at graduate programs, and I'm very much interested in imaging as this is what I've been doing for the last 2 years. I'm really interested in medical imaging, but my concern is saturation in the field of medical physics. Would pursuing a graduate degree in something like EE or physics optics be better as far as career opportunities go?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I did EE in undergraduate and read quite a bit of image processing papers with some having medical applications.

EE is nice because you can take the DSP classes that will build up a foundation to take advanced image processing classes.

You could go at it from the EE/Computer science side if you're interested in algorithms and implementation of those algorithms (edge mapping, segmentation).

I would only do physics optics if you're interested in making the physical image sensors or lenses.
 
You might want to look at medical physics graduate programs that have strong diagnostic imaging or MRI programs. Career opportunities is clinical medical physics are still generally better than those in pure academia.
 
Choppy said:
You might want to look at medical physics graduate programs that have strong diagnostic imaging or MRI programs. Career opportunities is clinical medical physics are still generally better than those in pure academia.

How difficult would it be to find a job in medical imaging though? I believe that medical physics is easier to get into than academia, but how much better?
 
kekekekek said:
How difficult would it be to find a job in medical imaging though? I believe that medical physics is easier to get into than academia, but how much better?

It's tough to give a quantitative response on this. I'm a radiation oncology physicist, not an imaging guy so I don't really keep a close eye on the imaging market.

For crude numbers, the academic job outlook is dictated by the fact that the typical professor will train about 10 PhDs over the course of his or her career, therefore the probability of obtaining an academic job is about 1/10.

With expertise in medical imaging your other directly relevant options are clinical work (working in hospitals maintaining optimal operation of imaging equipment or commissioning new equipment) or commercial work (product research and development, and then tangential stuff like training, sales, support). These aren't necessarily mutually exclusive either, which makes it a little complicated. Lots of clinical positions come with academic appointments for example - you won't be a full professor in the conventional sense, but you could have time for research and maybe some teaching responsibilities.

In the clinical arena, if you get a graduate degree in medical physics, https://www.natmatch.com/medphys/aboutstats.htmlsuggest a 50% chance of getting matched into a residency. (There's no breakdown by specialty that I know of, but for a ballpark I would guess about 80% of the available positions are in therapy.) On top of that there are also a handful of residency programs that do not participate in the matching process - so your outlook is probably a little better than these numbers suggest.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K