Delayed-choice multi entanglement swapping

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter StevieTNZ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Entanglement
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of delayed-choice multi-entanglement swapping, exploring whether it is feasible to create entanglement between photons after certain measurements have been made. The scope includes theoretical implications and potential experimental setups related to quantum entanglement and measurement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a scheme involving the measurement of photons 1 and 8 followed by entanglement swapping among the remaining photons, questioning if this would result in entanglement between photons 1 and 8.
  • Another participant expresses confusion regarding the relationship between the detected bell-states of photons 4 and 5 and those of photons 1 and 6, seeking clarification on why they differ.
  • A further contribution discusses the potential for different choices of bell-states among the photon pairs and how these choices could affect the entanglement outcomes, suggesting a connection between the states of different photon pairs.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus on the outcomes of the proposed entanglement swapping scheme, and there are differing views on the implications of the measurements made on the photons.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the assumptions behind the measurement choices and their effects on the entangled states, as well as the implications of post-selection in the proposed scenarios.

StevieTNZ
Messages
1,944
Reaction score
837
This idea is brought on by this paper: http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.5646
and the idea proposed by Asher Peres: http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9904042

is it possible to have delayed choice multi-entanglement swapping? i.e. create four pairs of photons – 1+2, 3+4, 5+6 and 7+8. Measure photons 1 and 8 first, then swap entanglement between the remaining six photons. I.e. bell-state measure photons 2 and 3, then bell-state measure photons 4 and 5. Then bell-state measure 6 and 7. I hope that made sense. I’m thinking the details out in my head.

Would that, in the end, make photons 1 and 8 entangled? If not, what scheme similar to the above would?

Many thanks
Stevie
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you can read this
 
naima said:
you can read this


Thanks for that article.

Why is it that when photons 4 and 5 are detected in a certain bell-state, photons 1 and 6 are detected in a different bell-state? I thought they would be detected in the same bell-state as 4 and 5.

Could someone shed some light on this?
 
the three pairs are supposed to be Ψ- (post selection? how?)
The author could have chosen 2-3 to be Ψ- 1-4 would have been also Ψ-
there is a second choice with 4-5 if you still choose them to be Ψ- 1-6 will be also Ψ-
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K