Delta function for \nabla(log s), where s = \sqrt{x^2+y^2}

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of the divergence theorem to the Laplacian of the logarithm of the radial distance, \( s = \sqrt{x^2+y^2} \). It establishes that \( \nabla^2 \ln s = 0 \) in polar coordinates, valid for regions where \( s > 0 \), explicitly excluding the origin. The participants clarify that the normal vector \( \vec{n} \) is perpendicular to the x-y plane, leading to the conclusion that the surface integral \( \int_S \nabla \ln s \cdot \vec{n} dS = 0 \). The discussion also addresses potential confusion regarding the notation of the gradient operator \( \nabla \) and its implications in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the divergence theorem in vector calculus
  • Familiarity with polar coordinates and their application in two dimensions
  • Knowledge of the Laplacian operator and its properties
  • Basic concepts of vector fields and normal vectors in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the divergence theorem and its applications in vector calculus
  • Learn about the properties of the Laplacian operator in different coordinate systems
  • Explore the implications of singularities in vector fields, particularly at the origin
  • Investigate the relationship between gradient, divergence, and Laplacian in multivariable calculus
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students focusing on vector calculus, particularly those dealing with potential theory and fluid dynamics.

zhuang382
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
What is ∇^2ln s in two dimensions where s =√x2+y2
Relevant Equations
delta function homework problem
My intuition for this problem is to use divergence theorem:

## \int_V \nabla^2 u dV = \int_S \nabla u \cdot \vec{n} dS##

But note that ##\vec{n}## is perpendicular to x-y plane, and makes ##\int_S \nabla \ln s \cdot \vec{n} dS = 0##

If we take laplacian in polar coordinate directly, then ##\nabla^2 \ln s = 0##

Can someone helps me on this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If ##\nabla## is defined as ##\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\vec{i} + \frac{\partial}{\partial y}\vec{j}## in two dimensions, why wouldn't you just compute the partial derivatives and see what you get? Also...I don't see a delta function from the title mentioned anywhere. Maybe you meant 'del', meaning ##\nabla##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: zhuang382
zhuang382 said:
My intuition for this problem is to use divergence theorem:

## \int_V \nabla^2 u dV = \int_S \nabla u \cdot \vec{n} dS##

But note that ##\vec{n}## is perpendicular to x-y plane, and makes ##\int_S \nabla \ln s \cdot \vec{n} dS = 0##
In two dimensions, ##V## would be an area in the ##xy## plane, and ##S## would be the boundary of that area.

If we take laplacian in polar coordinate directly, then ##\nabla^2 \ln s = 0##
This result is only valid in the region ##s>0##. You do need to keep in mind that you've excluded the origin.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: zhuang382

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K