Demonstration dips his wettened fingers into molten lead

  • Thread starter Thread starter thenewbosco
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Demonstration Lead
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a physics demonstration by Jearl Walker from Cleveland State University, where he dips wet fingers into molten lead at 327°C (740°F) without sustaining burns. The key principle is that the water on the fingers vaporizes upon contact with the molten lead, creating a protective vapor layer that prevents significant heat transfer to the skin. This phenomenon is similar to techniques used by dessert chefs when testing the temperature of molten sugar, where wet fingers provide a temporary shield against burns.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of heat transfer principles
  • Familiarity with phase changes, specifically vaporization
  • Knowledge of the properties of molten metals, particularly lead
  • Basic concepts of thermal conductivity
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the physics of heat transfer and thermal conductivity
  • Explore the safety precautions when handling molten materials
  • Learn about the properties and uses of lead in industrial applications
  • Investigate the science behind candy-making techniques involving molten sugar
USEFUL FOR

Physics educators, safety professionals, culinary experts, and anyone interested in the practical applications of heat transfer and material properties.

thenewbosco
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
Just reading a textbook and came across this interesting question:

"a daring lab instructor in a demonstration dips his wettened fingers into molten lead (327C) and withdraws them quickly without getting burned. How is this possible?"

I was thinking simply that the water on the fingers will absorb the heat and since he withdraws his fingers quickly it won't reach his hand but this sounds a little shady...any other ideas on this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The water vaporizes to form a protective sheath.

QUESTION: The professor readies a pan of molten lead, measuring 740 F. on the industrial thermometer, then prepares to plunge in a finger. What's he trying to prove?

ANSWER: It's Jearl Walker of Cleveland State University doing another wacky physics demo, described in "Fundamentals of Physics Extended, 5th Ed." He had read of 19th century carnival showmen dipping wet fingers into molten lead, and figured he was on to their secret: "As soon as the performer's wet flesh touched the hot liquid metal, part of the water vaporized, coating the fingers with a vapor layer. If the dip was brief, the flesh would not be heated significantly."

So Walker wetted a finger and took the plunge. "Amazingly, I felt no heat." The water had indeed vaporized to form a pro tective sheath. Growing bolder, he wetted and dipped in all the fingers of one hand, deep enough to touch the pan bottom.

"Still I questioned my explanation. Could I possibly touch the lead with a dry finger without suffering a burn? Leaving aside all rational thought, I tried it, immediately realizing my folly when pain raced through the finger." Then he dipped in a dry wiener, which blackened within seconds, lacking also the vapor protection.

NEVER, NEVER try this, warns Walker. A slight mistake can cause lead to solidify around the fingers, or send searing splashes onto the body. "I have been scarred on my arms and face from explosive vaporizations."
 
Last edited:
The cold water absorbs the heat before the fingers do. It only lasts a very brief time. Dessert chefs do something very similar when making various candies. They test what stage their molten sugar is at (softball, hardball, soft crack hard crack etc...)by dipping their hands in water and then grabbing a small portion of the molten sugar with their two fingers. They immediately take the molten sugar and put it under the water again to get the feel for the sugar. It doesn't burn you even though the molten sugar is usually well over 300 degrees.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
23
Views
9K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K
  • · Replies 186 ·
7
Replies
186
Views
93K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K