Density of an object in Relativity

  • Thread starter Thread starter gennarakis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density Relativity
gennarakis
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
If the density of an object increases in special relativity (as mass increases and volume decreases), wouldn't we see strange phenomena as skyrockets exploding (because some materials can't sustain to much pressure)??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's only the "relativistic mass", which is similar to velocity in that it depends on your choice of reference frame, that increases...in the object's own frame its relativistic mass does not increase, and its "rest mass" (which is what physicists usually mean by 'mass') is not dependent on your choice of frame. So, the rocket won't explode or show any other odd behaviors which would be noticed by someone at rest relative to it, regardless of its velocity relative to us.
 
So the mass (and furthermore the density) can only be measured in a non relative frame of reference (as that of an accelerating one) otherwise you would never know the real mass of yours, hence the density.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top