Derivation of the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter maverick280857
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equation, specifically transitioning from the covariant conservation of the energy-momentum tensor, represented as \(\nabla_\mu T^{\mu\nu} = 0\), to the equation \((\rho + p)\frac{d\alpha}{dr} = -\frac{dp}{dr}\) (equation 5.153) as presented in Sean Carroll's book on General Relativity. The user encounters complications involving extraneous terms like \(\sin^2 \theta\) during their derivation, which contradicts the expected spherically symmetric solution. They seek clarification on the necessary mathematical manipulations or bridging steps to achieve the correct formulation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity concepts, particularly the energy-momentum tensor.
  • Familiarity with covariant differentiation and the Bianchi identity.
  • Knowledge of spherical symmetry in physical systems.
  • Proficiency in mathematical manipulation of differential equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equation in detail.
  • Review the implications of the Bianchi identity in General Relativity.
  • Explore the role of spherical symmetry in energy-momentum tensor conservation.
  • Examine mathematical techniques for simplifying differential equations in curved spacetime.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on General Relativity, cosmology, and astrophysics, will benefit from this discussion.

maverick280857
Messages
1,774
Reaction score
5
Hi,

I am working through Section 5.8 of Sean Carroll's book on GR. Does someone know where I can find the bridging steps that take me from

\nabla_\mu T^{\mu\nu} = 0

to

(\rho + p)\frac{d\alpha}{dr} = -\frac{dp}{dr}

This is equation 5.153, and when I try to derive it through the condition that the energy-momentum tensor is covariantly conserved, I get terms involving sin^2 \theta which make no sense because the solution is spherically symmetric.

I couldn't find the bridging steps that lead to equation 5.153 anywhere, and I tried using the Bianchi identity to get something but that doesn't help for some reason. Is there some clever mathematical manipulation that I'm missing?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
maverick280857 said:
when I try to derive it through the condition that the energy-momentum tensor is covariantly conserved, I get terms involving sin^2 \theta

Can you post more details about the derivation you've tried? That will make it a lot easier to give feedback about what you may be missing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
921
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
535
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K