Derivative and function terminology

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the terminology and conceptual understanding of derivatives in mathematics and physics, particularly focusing on the distinction between quantities and functions. Participants explore the implications of taking derivatives of quantities like velocity and the nature of functions in mathematical expressions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question what it means to take the derivative of a quantity, such as velocity, which is not a function in the traditional sense.
  • Others argue that velocity can be viewed as a function of time, suggesting that taking the derivative involves considering this relationship.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of outputs in functions, with some participants asserting that both velocity and y are outputs of their respective functions.
  • One participant points out that the terminology used in physics and mathematics often conflates values and functions, which may lead to confusion.
  • Another participant elaborates on the distinction between a function and its evaluated value, suggesting that differentiation should be framed in terms of the function's output rather than the function itself.
  • Participants discuss the representation of relationships between quantities, proposing that these can be expressed as functions in a mathematical context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of derivatives concerning quantities and functions. There is no consensus on the terminology or the conceptual framework for understanding these relationships.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations in the discussion include varying definitions of functions and quantities, as well as the potential ambiguity in the use of terminology across mathematics and physics.

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44
In mathematical parlance, we say "take the derivative of a function f" to indicate that we are computing a new function, which maps slopes, that derives from f. However, in physics, we say "take the derivative of velocity". However, velocity is a quantity, not a function. What does it mean to take a derivative of a quantity? This goes for mathematics in general. If we have y = f(x), y is a quantity, not a function that maps between two sets. So what does it mean to "take the derivative of y"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Velocity is a quantity that changes over time so it can be considered a function whose domain is time, hence taking the derivative of velocity means taking it over time.
 
Mr Davis 97 said:
However, velocity is a quantity, not a function. What does it mean to take a derivative of a quantity? This goes for mathematics in general. If we have y = f(x), y is a quantity, not a function that maps between two sets. So what does it mean to "take the derivative of y"?
To elaborate on why jedishrfu said, velocity is a function of time, and y in your example is a function of x. Both functions are maps between two sets.
 
Mark44 said:
To elaborate on why jedishrfu said, velocity is a function of time, and y in your example is a function of x. Both functions are maps between two sets.
Aren't velocity and y both outputs to functions though? i.e. v = f(t) means f maps time to velocity. How is velocity a function in this case if it is an "output" variable?
 
Mr Davis 97 said:
Aren't velocity and y both outputs to functions though? i.e. v = f(t) means f maps time to velocity. How is velocity a function in this case if it is an "output" variable?
You could call the relationship between t and v by another name, but the relationship is that of a function. Many textbooks, especially physics ones will write things like v = v(t) to indicate that v is a function of t.
 
It is a conventional abuse of terminology. Although variables, like y, and expressions like f(x) are rigorously meant to represent numbers, or values, and the symbol f in f(x) is meant to represent the name of a function (while the function itself is a set of ordered pairs, or a collection of arrows, neither of which are convenient to explicitly write down in their entirety), it is common for both physicists and mathematicians to conflate all three entities and speak of "the function f(x)", "the function y = x^2", or even " the function t^2 + 1". It is a convenience that avoids unnecessary verbosity in practical applications in which other considerations are of far greater immediate importance. Someone who is interested in the structure of "what is a function" may be interested in the details, but seldom is that level of detail applicable outside of foundational considerations.
 
I think I need to elaborate on my original question a bit. By a value I don't mean a constant number a. By a value I mean f(x). You have to agree that y=f(x) is not a function, correct? It is the value of the function f evaluated at x; therefore, f(x) is the value of the function evaluated at an input x, just as f(x+1) would be the value of the function evaluated at an input x+1. I'm not saying the value f(x) is a constant real number or integer; I am simply saying that it is the result of applying f to the argument x, and not actually the function f. Therefore, my point is we say that d/dx is a function such that f↦f′. This is the statement I don't understand. When we perform differentiation, we need what the value of f for any x, namely f(x), in order to compute a derivative. What we do is insert the expression f(x) into the derivative operator, not purely f. Therefore, wouldn't it be more appropriate to write d/dx : f(x)↦f′(x), since f(x) is what we're actually inserting into the derivative operator?
 
When you relate a quantity ## v## (the velocity) with another quantity ##t## (the time) you obtain a relation ##t\mathcal{R}v=(t,v)##. You can represent ##\mathcal{R}## with points ## (t,v(t)) ## in the plane, this is the graph of a function that can be denoted simply by ##v(t)##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
7K