Deriving force from momentum using d(mv)/dt

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving force from momentum using the expression d(mv)/dt, exploring its implications and potential pitfalls in various contexts, particularly in relation to rocket propulsion and systems involving mass change.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the product rule of differentiation as it applies to momentum and force, with some questioning the validity of using the formula dp = m.dv + v.dm in specific scenarios, such as a leaking water tank.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of the momentum formula, with some participants providing insights into the conservation of momentum in rocketry. The discussion highlights the need for careful consideration of the system being analyzed and the assumptions made in applying the formula.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity introduced by mass loss in systems like rockets and the importance of correctly accounting for external forces and momentum changes. There is a reference to previous discussions on similar topics, indicating a broader context of inquiry.

Mohmmad Maaitah
Messages
90
Reaction score
20
Homework Statement
How did we Derive force from momentum
Relevant Equations
F=ma
P=mv
F=dp/dt
How did the d(mv)/dt become the other two?
Can someone explain how do we derive for new formulas in physics?
1684395405867.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Product rule of differentiation
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR
malawi_glenn said:
Product rule of differentiation
malawi_glenn said:
Product rule of differentiation
Thank you I just missed it.
 
You need to be very careful using this ##dp=m.dv+v.dm## form.
Consider e.g. a water tank mass m speed v leaking water at rate ##\rho##. If we blindly apply that formula we get ##\dot p= m\dot v+v\dot m=ma-v\rho##. Since there appear to be no external forces we might conclude ##ma=v\rho##, so the tank is accelerating.
The flaw is that the leaking water carries momentum away with it, which should be represented as an external force ##-v\rho##. Plugging that in gives ##a=0##.

My advice: don’t use it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK, malawi_glenn, BvU and 1 other person
haruspex said:
You need to be very careful using this ##dp=m.dv+v.dm## form.
Consider e.g. a water tank mass m speed v leaking water at rate ##\rho##. If we blindly apply that formula we get ##\dot p= m\dot v+v\dot m=ma-v\rho##. Since there appear to be no external forces we might conclude ##ma=v\rho##, so the tank is accelerating.
The flaw is that the leaking water carries momentum away with it, which should be represented as an external force ##-v\rho##. Plugging that in gives ##a=0##.

My advice: don’t use it.
So why do rockets work? I do not understand the point you are trying to make.
 
  • Skeptical
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK and MatinSAR
Frabjous said:
So why do rockets work? I do not understand the point you are trying to make.
You can solve rocketry questions using conservation of momentum quite easily without using that equation explicitly. In time ##\delta t## a mass of fuel ##\mu \delta t## is ejected at speed ##u## relative to the craft of remaining mass ##m##. ##m\delta v=u\mu\delta t##. This leads to ##v=u\ln(\frac{m_0}{m-\mu t})## as desired.

You can argue that I am effectively using the equation, but quoting the equation and then trying to apply it has pitfalls, such as the one I outlined. In the rocketry context, what exactly is the system which m represents?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK and MatinSAR
@Frabjous
erobz said:
Just for clarity, correcting post #11 using the proper way to capture the accumulation of momentum in the ejecta from @anuttarasammyak:

$$\sum F_{ext} = \frac{d}{dt} \left( p_{\rm{rocket}} + p_{\rm{fuel}} + p_{\rm{ejecta}} \right)$$

Mass of the rocket is constant ##M_r##

The mass of fuel lost from the rocket is gained by the ejecta ## \frac{dM_e}{dt} = -\frac{dM_f}{dt}##

The velocity of the ejecta in the rest frame is ##v_{e/O} = v_r - v_{e/r}## and is constant after being ejected, but the momentum of the ejecta is accumulating, hence:

$$\sum F_{ext} = \frac{d}{dt} \left( M_r v_r + M_f v_r + \int \frac{dM_e}{dt}( v_r - v_{e/r}) ~dt \right)$$

Applying the derivative:

$$\sum F_{ext} = \overbrace{\left( M_r\frac{dv_r}{dt} \right)}^{\rm {rocket}} +\overbrace{\left(M_f\frac{dv_r}{dt} + \frac{dM_f}{dt}v_r\right)}^{\rm{fuel}}+ \overbrace{ \frac{dM_e}{dt}( v_r - v_{e/r})}^{\rm{ejecta}} $$

$$\sum F_{ext} = \left( M_r + M_f \right) \frac{dv_r}{dt}+ \cancel{ \left( \frac{dM_f}{dt}v_r + \frac{dM_e}{dt}v_r \right)}^0 -\frac{dM_e}{dt} v_{e/r}$$

The Rocket Equation:

$$ \sum F_{ext} = \left( M_r + M_f \right) \frac{dv_r}{dt} + \frac{dM_f}{dt} v_{e/r}$$

The issue comes up often about taking ##F = \frac{dp}{dt} = \frac{d}{dt} \big( mv \big)##.

We (several posters) took the time not too long ago to figure out how to apply it for "The Rocket Equation". I think this is what @haruspex means by "you have to be careful". It wasn't immediately obvious how to get it to work out.

The whole exchange:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...oblem-confused-about-newtons-2nd-law.1050482/
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK, Frabjous and MatinSAR

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
866
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K