Deriving Jeans' Result from Magnetic Vector Potential

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on deriving Jeans' result from the magnetic vector potential, specifically the expression for the Hamiltonian H in terms of electric and magnetic fields. The magnetic vector potential is defined as A(x,t) = (1/sqrt(V)) Σ(k,α)(c(kα)(t) u(kα)(x) + c.c.), where c(kα)(t) = c(kα)(0) e^{-iω(kα)t}. The user seeks clarification on the necessity of the complex conjugate term and how to evaluate a specific integral involving the gauge condition k · u(kα) = 0. The goal is to demonstrate that a particular term vanishes, leading to the desired expression for H.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic vector potential and its role in electrodynamics
  • Familiarity with complex analysis, particularly complex conjugates in physical contexts
  • Knowledge of Hamiltonian mechanics and its application in electromagnetism
  • Proficiency in vector calculus, especially operations like divergence and curl
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Hamiltonian in classical electrodynamics
  • Learn about gauge invariance and its implications in electromagnetic theory
  • Investigate the properties of vector potentials and their relationship to electric and magnetic fields
  • Explore advanced topics in quantum field theory related to vector potentials and their quantization
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in electromagnetism and quantum field theory, as well as graduate students seeking to deepen their understanding of vector potentials and their applications in theoretical physics.

noospace
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to get from the magnetic vector potential

\vec{A}(\vec{x},t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\mathcal{V}}}\sum_{\vec{k},\alpha=1,2}(c_{\vec{k}\alpha}(t) \vec{u}_{\vec{k}\alpha}(\vec{x}) + c.c.)

where
c_{\vec{k}\alpha}(t) = c_{\vec{k}\alpha}(0) e^{-i\omega_{\vec{k}\alpha}t}
\vec{u}_{\vec{k}\alpha}(t) = \vec{u}_{\vec{k}\alpha}(0) e^{i \vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}}
c.c. = complex conjugate.

to Jeans' result

H := \frac{1}{2}\int d^3\vec{x} (E^2 + B^2) = \sum_{k,\alpha}\left(\frac{\omega_{k\alpha}}{c}\right)^2 2c_{\vec{k}\alpha}^\ast c_{\vec{k}\alpha}.

The first question I have is why we add the complex conjugate term at all. In classical electrodynamics, I'm used to dealing with the complex fields?

Tod derive the result, my approach was to define the complex vector potential

\widetilde{\vec{A}}(\vec{x},t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\mathcal{V}}}\sum_{\vec{k},\alpha=1,2}c_{\vec{k}\alpha}(t) \vec{u}_{\vec{k}\alpha}(\vec{x})

and use the relation

H = \frac{1}{2}\int d^3\vec{x} \frac{1}{2} (\Re[\widetilde{\vec{E}}\cdot \widetilde{\vec{E}}^\ast]+\Re[\widetilde{\vec{B}}\cdot \widetilde{\vec{B}}^\ast])

where \widetilde{\vec{E}} = - \frac{1}{c}\frac{\partial \widetilde{\vec{A}}}{\partial t}, \;\widetilde{\vec{B}} = \nabla \times \widetilde{\vec{A}}.

The first term is easy to deal with and gives (after using the normalization \frac{1}{\mathcal{V}}\int d^3\vec{x} \vec{u}_{\vec{k}\alpha}\cdot\vec{u}_{\vec{k'}\alpha'}^\ast = \delta_{\vec{k}\vec{k}'}\delta_{\alpha\alpha'}):

\frac{1}{4}\int d^3 \vec{x}\Re[\widetilde{\vec{E}}\cdot \widetilde{\vec{E}}^\ast] = \frac{1}{4}\sum_{k,\alpha}\left(\frac{\omega_{k\alpha}}{c}\right)^2 c_{\vec{k}\alpha}^\ast c_{\vec{k}\alpha}

The second term is a bit more problematic. Using the identity

(\vec{k} \times \vec{u})\cdot(\vec{k}' \times \vec{u}') = \vec{k} \cdot\vec{k}' \vec{u} \cdot\vec{u}' - \vec{k} \cdot{u}' \vec{k}' \cdot\vec{u}

I get

\widetilde{\vec{B}} = \nabla \times \widetilde{\vec{A}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{V}}\sum_{\vec{k},\alpha} i c_{\vec{k}\alpha} \vec{k} \times \vec{u}_{\vec{k}\alpha}

so

\frac{1}{2}\int d^3\vec{x} \frac{1}{2}\Re[\widetilde{\vec{B}}\cdot \widetilde{\vec{B}}^\ast]

= \frac{1}{4}\sum_{\vec{k},\alpha=1,2}\left(\frac{\omega_{\vec{k}\alpha}}{c}\right)^2 c_{\vec{k}\alpha}^\ast c_{\vec{k}\alpha} - \frac{1}{4}\frac{1}{V}\sum_{\vec{k},\vec{k}',\alpha,\alpha'}\int d^3 \vec{x} c^\ast_{\vec{k}'\alpha'}c_{\vec{k}\alpha} (\vec{k}\cdot \vec{u}^\ast_{\vec{k}'\alpha'})(\vec{k'}\cdot \vec{u}_{\vec{k}\alpha})

where I have used the normalization condition to evaluate the first term. I'm stuck on how to evaluate this last integral. I know that I have to use the Gauge condition that \vec{k} \cdot \vec{u}_{\vec{k}\alpha} = 0 but I'm not sure how to incorporate it.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I suppose what I want to show is that the term

\sum_{\vec{k},\vec{k}',\alpha,\alpha'}\int d^3 \vec{x} c^\ast_{\vec{k}'\alpha'}c_{\vec{k}\alpha} (\vec{k}\cdot \vec{u}^\ast_{\vec{k}'\alpha'})(\vec{k'}\cdot \vec{u}_{\vec{k}\alpha})

vanihses. For then,

\frac{1}{2}\int d^3 \vec{x}\frac{1}{2}\Re[\widetilde{\vec{E}}\cdot\widetilde{\vec{E}}^\ast + \widetilde{\vec{B}}\cdot\widetilde{\vec{B}}^\ast] = \frac{1}{2}\sum_{\vec{k},\alpha}\left(\frac{\omega_{\vec{k}\alpha}}{c}\right)^2 c^\ast_{\vec{k}\alpha}c_{\vec{k}\alpha}

which is uncannily similar to what I set out to show. I know \vec{k} \cdot\vec{u}_{\vec{k}\alpha} so I can reduce the sum to a sum over \sum_{\vec{k} \neq \vec{k}',\alpha,\alpha}
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K