I Deriving Special Relativity from Particle Indistinguishability

accdd
Messages
95
Reaction score
20
Is it possible to derive special relativity from the principle of quantum mechanics according to which particles of the same type are indistinguishable?
For example, if it is not possible to distinguish particles of the same type then particles colliding in a train at constant speed should produce the same result as those colliding in the lab. This would imply that the laws of physics are the same on the train and in the laboratory.
Is that a question that makes sense?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
accdd said:
Is it possible to derive special relativity from the principle of quantum mechanics according to which particles of the same type are indistinguishable?
No.
For example, if it is not possible to distinguish particles of the same type then particles colliding in a train at constant speed should produce the same result as those colliding in the lab. This would imply that the laws of physics are the same on the train and in the laboratory.
That does not follow. The laws of physics apply to distinguishable particles just as they do to indistinguishable ones, so they can be the same on the train and in the lab regardless of the distinguishability of the particles.

Note that this notion that the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames way predates the development of SR.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, PeroK, accdd and 1 other person
It’s not at all clear how “indistinguishable particles” implies the causal structure of Minkowski (lorentz-signature) spacetime
(with its finite maximum signal speed).
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and accdd
accdd said:
Is it possible to derive special relativity from the principle of quantum mechanics according to which particles of the same type are indistinguishable?
No, but SR is related to quantum mechanics charge-parity-time symmetry.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and accdd
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...

Similar threads

Back
Top