I Deriving the time-dependent wave equation from Energy eigenfunctions

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dirac_Clarity_GOAT
  • Start date Start date
Dirac_Clarity_GOAT
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
##\sum_{E} c_E \exp(- \frac{-i}{\hbar} Et) u_{E}(x) ## where ## c_E = \int_{-\infty}{+\infty} u_{E}^{*}(x) \psi_{0}##
Note: My Intro QM course is structured such that we work with Fourier Transformations etc. Before Bra-Ket Notation. Sorry if the notation is cumbersome/exoteric

Hi, in my Homework I was tasked to "derive" the time dependent wavefunction ## \psi(x,t) ## from the initial wave function:
I have attempted the derivation:
Please help me see if I make sense:
$$
\psi(x,0) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{ \sqrt{ 2 \pi } \sigma_{0} }} \exp\left( \frac{i}{\hbar} p_{0} x \right) \exp\left( -\frac{1}{4 \sigma_{0}^{2}} (x- x_{0})^{2} \right)
$$

I derive the energy eigenfunctions from the Potential free Schrodinger equation to get:
$$
u_{E_{n}}(x) = A_{1} \exp(i k_{n} x) + A_{2} \exp(- i k_{n} x)
$$
Where ## k_{n} = \pm \sqrt{ \frac{2mE_{n}}{\hbar^{2}} } ## is the n-th wave number of the free-particle.
And ## A_1 , A_2 ## are Complex numbers to be determined.

Then substituting into:
$$
\psi(x,t) = \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} c_{E_n} \exp\left( -\frac{i}{\hbar} E_nt \right) u_{E_n}(x)
$$

Although the expression is sum over the different energy eigenvalues, for the next step I have Chosen to integrate over the wave-vector. I do not know the reason. I have done so because my energy eigenfunction are expressed in k. I also have the vague notion that in the Fourier transform of from k -> x involves taking a superposition of different standing waves. For high wave-number => small wave-length => tends to be out of phase => destructive interference => 0 amplitude => localised wave packet which is what I want.
Here is the expression:

$$
\psi(x,t) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} [C_1 e^{i(k_0-k)x_0} e^{-\frac{(k_0-k)^2\sigma_0^2}{\hbar^2}} + C_2 e^{i(k_0+k)x_0} e^{-\frac{(k_0+k)^2\sigma_0^2}{\hbar^2}}] e^{-i\frac{\hbar k^2}{2m}t} [A_1 e^{ikx} + A_2 e^{-ikx}] dk
$$

After some tedious calculations I get the wave-function as a sum of 4-components:
1. $$C_1A_1 \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{i(k_0-k)x_0} e^{-\frac{(k_0-k)^2\sigma_0^2}{\hbar^2}} e^{-i\frac{\hbar k^2}{2m}t} e^{ikx} dk$$
2. $$C_1A_2 \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{i(k_0-k)x_0} e^{-\frac{(k_0-k)^2\sigma_0^2}{\hbar^2}} e^{-i\frac{\hbar k^2}{2m}t} e^{-ikx} dk$$
3. $$C_2A_1 \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{i(k_0+k)x_0} e^{-\frac{(k_0+k)^2\sigma_0^2}{\hbar^2}} e^{-i\frac{\hbar k^2}{2m}t} e^{ikx} dk$$
4. $$C_2A_2 \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{i(k_0+k)x_0} e^{-\frac{(k_0+k)^2\sigma_0^2}{\hbar^2}} e^{-i\frac{\hbar k^2}{2m}t} e^{-ikx} dk$$


From this helpful video
http://Phase Velocity versus Group velocity
And Ehrenfest Theorem: I deduce the Group velocity of the Gaussian Packet is:
$$
v_{g} = \frac{\hbar k_{0}}{m} = \frac{p_{0}}{m}
$$


But what was the initial phase velocity of the energy eigenfunctions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The spectrum of the Hamiltonian for the free particle is continuous as opposed to discrete, thus there is no need to index them by a discrete label like "## n##", rather think of them as labeled by the wave number ##k##:
$$E={{\hbar}^2k^2\over 2m}.$$
The solutions are:
$$\Psi(x,t)=Ae^{ik(x-{\hbar k\over 2m}t)}+Be^{-ik(x+{\hbar k\over 2m}t)},$$
These are "travelling waves" with velocity
$$v={\hbar |k|\over 2m}.$$
Thus, without loss of generality we can write the solution as:
$$\Psi(x,t)=Ae^{i(kx-{\hbar k^2\over 2m}t)}.$$
To form the general solution the trick is to take all possible linear combinations of the above solutions. In this case we do not sum over a discrete index but over the continuous index ##k##. Thus the sum is replaced by integration.
The general solution to the time dependent Schrodinger equation is:
$$\Psi(x,t)={1\over\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\phi(k)e^{i(kx-{\hbar k^2\over 2m}t)}\; dk$$
Thus, the initial value is given by:
$$\Psi(x,0)={1\over\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\phi(k)e^{ikx}\; dk,$$
therefore by Plancherel's theorem we can find ##\phi(k)## which are analogous to the Fourier coefficients used to take the linear combinations when the energy eigenvalues are discrete,
$$\phi(k)={1\over\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\Psi(x,0)e^{-ikx}\; dx.$$
 
  • Like
Likes Dirac_Clarity_GOAT
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top