Deriving vacuum FRW equations directly from action

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) equations directly from the Einstein-Hilbert action for a universe dominated by the cosmological constant (Λ). The equations of motion derived include: \((\frac{\dot a}{a})^2 + \frac{k}{a^2} = \frac{\Lambda}{3}\) and \(2\frac{\ddot a}{a} + (\frac{\dot a}{a})^2 + \frac{k}{a^2} = \Lambda\). The FRW metric is utilized to express the Ricci scalar \(R\) and the determinant of the metric \(\sqrt{-g}\). The discussion contrasts this method with the conventional approach of deriving the Einstein Field Equation first and highlights that the general solution for a universe with only a cosmological constant is de Sitter spacetime.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Einstein-Hilbert action
  • Familiarity with Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) metric
  • Knowledge of Euler-Lagrange equations in classical mechanics
  • Concept of de Sitter spacetime and cosmological constant (Λ)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Einstein Field Equation from the Einstein-Hilbert action
  • Explore the implications of the cosmological constant in cosmology
  • Learn about different coordinate systems in de Sitter spacetime
  • Investigate the relationship between curvature and the dynamics of the universe
USEFUL FOR

Cosmologists, theoretical physicists, and students of general relativity seeking to deepen their understanding of the derivation of cosmological equations from fundamental principles.

jcap
Messages
166
Reaction score
12
Using the Einstein-Hilbert action for a Universe with just the cosmological constant ##\Lambda##:
$$S=\int\Big[\frac{R}{2}-\Lambda\Big]\sqrt{-g}\ d^4x$$
I would like to derive the equations of motion:
$$\Big(\frac{\dot a}{a}\Big)^2+\frac{k}{a^2}=\frac{\Lambda}{3}\tag{1}$$
$$2\frac{\ddot a}{a}+\Big(\frac{\dot a}{a}\Big)^2+\frac{k}{a^2}=\Lambda\tag{2}$$
I use the FRW metric to substitute in
$$R=\frac{6}{a^2}(a\ddot a+\dot a^2+k)$$
and
$$\sqrt{-g} \propto a^3$$
I then have the following Euler-Lagrange equation for derivatives of ##a(t)##:
$$\frac{\partial L}{\partial a}-\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot a}+\frac{d^2}{dt^2}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \ddot a}=0$$
This gives me equation (2).

How would I get equation (1) using this approach?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jcap said:
I use the FRW metric to substitute in

This is backwards from the usual approach. The usual approach is to derive the Einstein Field Equation in general form as the Euler-Lagrange equation for the action you gave; this can be done without making any assumption at all regarding the metric.

Once you have the Einstein Field Equation, you then just solve it with appropriate assumptions for the symmetries of the spacetime and a corresponding choice of coordinates.

Note that, for a universe with just a cosmological constant, the general solution is de Sitter spacetime, for which different coordinate choices will give you different values of ##k##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
967
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K