Describing Matrix/Transformation by Eigens.
- Level: Graduate
- Thread starter WWGD
- Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
4 replies · 3K views
Physics news on Phys.org
Discussion
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
- 7,917
- 13,231
I see. I am trying to show that by applying kri+rj , i.e., adding a multiple of k times row i to
row j one row to another row has the effect of rotating one of the k-planes about the
solution subspace, since this is the only way I can conceive that the operation kri+rj
preserves the solution to the system. Can you see how I else I can show this?
row j one row to another row has the effect of rotating one of the k-planes about the
solution subspace, since this is the only way I can conceive that the operation kri+rj
preserves the solution to the system. Can you see how I else I can show this?
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
- 7,917
- 13,231
Well, I have a soluble , i.e., non-contradictory (homogeneous) system of linear equations .
The fundamental row operations--exchange rows, add a multiple of one
row to another row-- preserve the solutions to the system. If we look at the
solution S to the system geometrically, this is a subspace, possibly trivial. I'm trying
to show that the operation of adding a multiple of row i to row j has the effect of
rotating the n-planes in the system of equations about the solution- space S.
I think the affine case--for non-homogeneous systems, is similar. I've been using
the fundamental theorem of linear algebra that Bacle had mentioned in a similar
problem, but I still can't prove this.
The fundamental row operations--exchange rows, add a multiple of one
row to another row-- preserve the solutions to the system. If we look at the
solution S to the system geometrically, this is a subspace, possibly trivial. I'm trying
to show that the operation of adding a multiple of row i to row j has the effect of
rotating the n-planes in the system of equations about the solution- space S.
I think the affine case--for non-homogeneous systems, is similar. I've been using
the fundamental theorem of linear algebra that Bacle had mentioned in a similar
problem, but I still can't prove this.
Similar threads
High School
What are matrix transformations?
- Sreekar adithya
- · Replies 3 ·
- Linear and Abstract Algebra
- Replies
- 3
- evinda
- · Replies 1 ·
- Linear and Abstract Algebra
- Replies
- 1
- Carla1985
- · Replies 3 ·
- Linear and Abstract Algebra
- Replies
- 3
- FlorenceC
- · Replies 4 ·
- Linear and Abstract Algebra
- Replies
- 4
- SNicolas
- · Replies 3 ·
- Linear and Abstract Algebra
- Replies
- 3
- Harry Case
- · Replies 8 ·
- Special and General Relativity
- Replies
- 8
- adrs
- · Replies 1 ·
- Linear and Abstract Algebra
- Replies
- 1
- mathsciguy
- · Replies 2 ·
- Linear and Abstract Algebra
- Replies
- 2
- Ali Asadullah
- · Replies 5 ·
- Linear and Abstract Algebra
- Replies
- 5
- qybah
- · Replies 3 ·
- Linear and Abstract Algebra
- Replies
- 3