Describing vectors in a different coordinate system

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44
The problem I am having is a problem in my textbook. It says that if we have xy Cartesian coordinate system, and if we then have a rotated coordinate system x'y', then to get the vector in the x'y' in terms of the xy system, we use the following arguments for the unit vectors:

i' = icos[itex]\Phi[/itex] + jsin[itex]\Phi[/itex]

j' = jcos[itex]\Phi[/itex] - isin[itex]\Phi[/itex]

I don't understand how this was derived, or where it came from. I try to use the right-angle definition for trig ratios, but I keep getting different numbers, and don't see how this relation is true. I would really appreciate it if somebody could provide a simple explanation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mr Davis 97 said:
The problem I am having is a problem in my textbook. It says that if we have xy Cartesian coordinate system, and if we then have a rotated coordinate system x'y', then to get the vector in the x'y' in terms of the xy system, we use the following arguments for the unit vectors:

i' = icos[itex]\Phi[/itex] + jsin[itex]\Phi[/itex]

j' = jcos[itex]\Phi[/itex] - isin[itex]\Phi[/itex]

I don't understand how this was derived, or where it came from. I try to use the right-angle definition for trig ratios, but I keep getting different numbers, and don't see how this relation is true. I would really appreciate it if somebody could provide a simple explanation.

The derivation is mostly a matter of geometry. Perhaps this figure can clear things up:

RotateAroundZaxis.gif