Conversion between vector components in different coordinate systems

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the conversion of vector components between different coordinate systems, specifically examining the formulas related to the transformation of vector components. Participants are exploring the implications of these equations in the context of both Cartesian and non-Cartesian systems.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to clarify the meaning of the equations and whether the components refer specifically to Cartesian coordinates or other bases. Some participants question the accuracy of the equations presented and suggest alternative formulations. Others express surprise at the classification of the question as "precalculus," indicating a belief that it involves calculus concepts.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and questioning the assumptions behind the equations. There is no explicit consensus on the correctness of the equations, but alternative interpretations and formulations are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential discrepancies in the classification of the problem's difficulty level, suggesting that it may involve more advanced concepts than indicated. The relevance of the equations to various coordinate systems is also under examination.

Karl Karlsson
Messages
104
Reaction score
12
Homework Statement
I am not completely sure what the formulas ##v_j = v^a\frac {\partial x^j} {\partial \chi^a}## and ##v^b = v^a\frac {\partial \chi^b} {\partial x^j}## mean. Is ##v_j## the j:th cartesian component of the vector ##\vec v## or could it hold for other bases as well? What does the second equation ##v^b = v^a\frac {\partial \chi^b} {\partial x^j}## mean? Is this just the relation between the b:th and j:th component of ##\vec v## being expressed as tangent vectors?
Relevant Equations
##v_j = v^a\frac {\partial x^j} {\partial \chi^a}## and ##v^b = v^a\frac {\partial \chi^b} {\partial x^j}##
I am not completely sure what the formulas ##v_j = v^a\frac {\partial x^j} {\partial \chi^a}## and ##v^b = v^a\frac {\partial \chi^b} {\partial x^j}## mean. Is ##v_j## the j:th cartesian component of the vector ##\vec v## or could it hold for other bases as well? What does the second equation ##v^b = v^a\frac {\partial \chi^b} {\partial x^j}## mean? Is this just the relation between the b:th and j:th component of ##\vec v## being expressed as tangent vectors?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm. The "relevant equations" seem slightly wrong, to me. I think it should be:

##v^j = v^a \frac{\partial x^j}{\partial \chi^a}## and ##v^a = v^j \frac{\partial \chi^a}{\partial x^j}##

Having said that, the equations are good for translating between any two coordinate systems, whether Cartesian, or not.
 
I'm surprised that this question is considered "precalculus". It seems like calculus, to me.
 
stevendaryl said:
I'm surprised that this question is considered "precalculus". It seems like calculus, to me.
To me, also. I have moved this thread, although the OP might not still be interested in it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K