Description of a nuclear EMP event

  • Thread starter Thread starter GTOM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nuclear
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the physical accuracy of a fictional nuclear EMP event description. Key points include the potential resilience of military devices to EMP and the reliance of modern tractors on GPS for navigation, which could fail during an EMP event. The impact on hospitals is debated, with the argument that they might fare better due to local generators. Concerns are raised about the feasibility of space-to-surface missiles, as they violate existing treaties. The visual portrayal of nuclear detonations is critiqued, suggesting they would appear as massive flashbulbs rather than "white balls like the Moon."
GTOM
Messages
966
Reaction score
67
I wonder whether the following description is physically accurate:

White balls like the Moon appeared on the night sky, when the nukes detonated in the ionosphere. Computers and cellphones ceased to function, transformators were overloaded and smoked. As if ancient, cruel gods punished humanity for their sins, fire rained down to Earth: space to surface missiles turned power plants and protected server rooms to craters. Many have died due to the bombing, or power shortage in hospitals. But the aftermath were even worse. The civilisation collapsed. Many robotic tractors survived the EMP, since their large, metallic bodies protected the electronics like Faraday cages, and most bombs went off above the cities. But eventually, they became inoperative due to lack of fuel and maintenance. Famine ravaged.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GTOM said:
I wonder whether the following description is physically accurate:
Any part specifically, @GTOM?

Depending on when your story is set, many military devices would likely be resistant to EMP, and if we're using photonic computing, consumer devices may be as well. I'm not sure that a "large, metallic body" would protect the innards of a tractor, but even if they did, most such devices would presumably be using GPS for navigation, and the antenna would probably conduct sufficient energy into the electronics to burn them out. The GPS satellites should be okay, they orbit around 20kms up, but ones in lower orbits would be impacted and there might be sufficient atmospheric interference that the tractors would not have consistent signals to navigate by, irrespective of fuel (which would run out well before maintenance was needed, unless they are solar powered with self-return to PV-charged batteries at end of shift. Assuming the solar panels survive the EMP, which is unlikely.

In terms of transformers, there was a superstorm in 1989 and geomagnetic-induced currents melted windings of a large transformer at the Salem Nuclear plant, and that would cause smoke, no doubt, so that's realistic.

The population of hospitals would be trivial compared to the rest of a city, so I'm not sure why you've called that out, but hospitals typically have local generators, so if they did not burn out - and they might not if they were in a basement - ironically a hospital might fare better than the rest of the city.

Where did the space to surface missiles come from? This must be set in the future, as we don't have them currently, they violate numerous global treaties. Irrespective, any large scale bombing in a city would wreak havoc.

But there is a good description of the US nuclear bomb that was detonated in the ionosphere, the explosions are not going to be "white balls like the Moon", they are going to be giant flashbulbs going off, visible across continents! Which is much more dramatic and would be fun to write.

https://space4peace.org/why-the-u-s-once-set-off-a-nuclear-bomb-in-space/
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes GTOM and berkeman
Melbourne Guy said:
Any part specifically, @GTOM?

Depending on when your story is set, many military devices would likely be resistant to EMP, and if we're using photonic computing, consumer devices may be as well. I'm not sure that a "large, metallic body" would protect the innards of a tractor, but even if they did, most such devices would presumably be using GPS for navigation, and the antenna would probably conduct sufficient energy into the electronics to burn them out. The GPS satellites should be okay, they orbit around 20kms up, but ones in lower orbits would be impacted and there might be sufficient atmospheric interference that the tractors would not have consistent signals to navigate by, irrespective of fuel (which would run out well before maintenance was needed, unless they are solar powered with self-return to PV-charged batteries at end of shift. Assuming the solar panels survive the EMP, which is unlikely.

In terms of transformers, there was a superstorm in 1989 and geomagnetic-induced currents melted windings of a large transformer at the Salem Nuclear plant, and that would cause smoke, no doubt, so that's realistic.

The population of hospitals would be trivial compared to the rest of a city, so I'm not sure why you've called that out, but hospitals typically have local generators, so if they did not burn out - and they might not if they were in a basement - ironically a hospital might fare better than the rest of the city.

Where did the space to surface missiles come from? This must be set in the future, as we don't have them currently, they violate numerous global treaties. Irrespective, any large scale bombing in a city would wreak havoc.

But there is a good description of the US nuclear bomb that was detonated in the ionosphere, the explosions are not going to be "white balls like the Moon", they are going to be giant flashbulbs going off, visible across continents! Which is much more dramatic and would be fun to write.

https://space4peace.org/why-the-u-s-once-set-off-a-nuclear-bomb-in-space/
Ok, thanks for the info. I didnt know tractors rely so much on GPS. Hospitals, if all electronic device stop working on intensive care, it is still nasty, isn't it?
Those treaties were no longer since the leaders of the world could escape to Moon.
 
GTOM said:
I didnt know tractors rely so much on GPS
Oops, my bad. I'd assumed they are autonomous - though even large ones now use GPS for fine control of their line across large fields. But yeah, manual ones generally won't 👍
 
We've just had an interesting thread about generation ships, but I don't think that that is the most reasonable way to colonize another planet. Fatal problems: - Crew may become chaotic and self destructive. - Crew may become so adapted to space as to be unwilling to return to a planet. - Making the planet habitable may take longer then the trip, so the ship needs to last far longer than just the journey. - Mid-flight malfunction may render the ship unable to decelerate at the destination...
I know this topic is extremely contraversial and debated, but I'm writing a book where an AI attempts to become as human as possible. Would it, eventually, especially in the far future, be possible for an AI to gain a conscious? To be clear, my definition of a consciousness being the ability to possess self-created morals, thoughts, and views, AKA a whole personality. And if this is possible (and let's just say it is for this question), about how long may it take for something to happen...
This is a question for people who know about astrophysics. It's been said that the habitable zones around red dwarf stars are so close to those stars that any planets in the zones would be tidally locked to the stars in question. With one side roasting and another side freezing almost forever, those planets wouldn't be hospitable to life. a) Could there be forms of life--whole ecologies--that first evolve in the planet's twilight zone and then extend their habitat by burrowing...
Back
Top