Designating matrices by (system2 operator system1)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lojzek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices Operator
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the notation (S2 O S1) used to designate matrices in the context of crystallography, where S1 and S2 represent input and output coordinate systems, respectively, and O denotes the linear operator. This notation is considered more informative than traditional capital letter designations, as it clarifies matrix transformations between different coordinate systems. However, it is noted that this specific designation is not common in mathematics, particularly in linear algebra. The conversation suggests that while the concept may relate to linear transformations of tensor spaces, the notation itself lacks widespread usage. The user seeks confirmation and resources regarding the prevalence of this notation in mathematical literature.
Lojzek
Messages
246
Reaction score
1
Hi,

I already posted this in solid state physics forum, but no one answered, so I guess this topic might belong to Mathematics.

I read a text about crystallography where matrices were designated in the form:

(S2 O S1)

where S1 is input coordinate system, S2 is output coordinate system and O is the linear operator corresponding to the matrix. I found this designation is often more useful than the usual matrix designation by a capital letter (which omits information about coordinate systems): in particular, matrix transformations between different coordinate systems are made particulary transparent.

Does anyone know whether this designation is common in mathematics?
If so, in what area of mathematics is it used? Please provide links if possible.
(I would like to know this because I am using this designation in my graduation work)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lojzek said:
Does anyone know whether this designation is common in mathematics?
It is not.
If so, in what area of mathematics is it used?
It would be in Linear algebra, but it isn't used. At least what I can deduce from your sparse description of the ##S_i##. It looks like a linear transformation of a vector space of tensors.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K