DeSitter cosmological horizon stability?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the stability of the DeSitter cosmological horizon in an expanding universe influenced by the cosmological constant. It is established that the horizon may evaporate similarly to a black hole, leading to a dilution of the cosmological constant. The implications of this evaporation process and its potential to stabilize the horizon through radiation absorption are debated, with references to a specific paper (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560872) that presents a speculative model. The consensus is that the model lacks experimental validation and may contain inherent inconsistencies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of DeSitter spacetime
  • Knowledge of cosmological constants
  • Familiarity with black hole physics and Hawking radiation
  • Basic grasp of theoretical physics and cosmology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the cosmological constant on universe expansion
  • Study the properties of DeSitter spacetime in detail
  • Explore the mechanisms of Hawking radiation and black hole thermodynamics
  • Investigate current theories and models regarding cosmological horizons
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, theoretical physicists, and cosmologists interested in the dynamics of the universe's expansion and the behavior of cosmological horizons.

Suekdccia
Messages
352
Reaction score
30
TL;DR
DeSitter cosmological horizon stability?
If the universe keeps expanding at an accelerated rate (given by the cosmological constant) then the universe would approach a DeSitter spacetime where there would be a cosmological horizon that would radiate just as the event horizon of a black hole radiates Hawking radiation

I thought that once this state is reached, the universe would stay like that, but I recently discovered that this horizon could evaporate just like a black hole and the cosmological constant would dilute (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560872).

Is this true? Even if that happened and the expansion would stop being accelerated by a cosmological constanr, what would happen then after?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Space news on Phys.org
Suekdccia said:
Is this true?
It's a speculative model which we have no way of testing by experiment now or in the foreseeable future.
 
PeterDonis said:
It's a speculative model which we have no way of testing by experiment now or in the foreseeable future.
Even if this model was right and the horizon tends to evaporate, wouldn't the radiation eventually be reabsorbed by the cosmological horizon (balancing the process and keeping the horizon stable after all)?
 
Suekdccia said:
Even if this model was right and the horizon tends to evaporate, wouldn't the radiation eventually be reabsorbed by the cosmological horizon (balancing the process and keeping the horizon stable after all)?
The model in the paper does not appear to be saying that (it appears to be saying that the ultimate limit of the process is flat spacetime), but I'm not sure how valid the model in the paper is. As I said, it's speculative, and many speculative models turn out to have inconsistencies in them that aren't obvious at first glance.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K