Details of the double-slit experiment?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The double-slit experiment with electrons demonstrates fundamental principles of quantum mechanics, particularly wave-particle duality. The slits are 50 microns long and 0.3 microns wide, with a grating constant of 1 micron, as detailed in Jönsson's 1961 paper. The barrier is a glass plate coated with a 200 Angstrom thick silver film, and the experiment operates in a vacuum of 10^-4 Torr. Testing whether the electrons hitting the screen are the same as those emitted from the electron gun is complex, as electrons are indistinguishable quantum particles, and their behavior leads to self-interference.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly wave-particle duality.
  • Familiarity with electron diffraction and interference patterns.
  • Knowledge of experimental setups in physics, specifically the double-slit experiment.
  • Basic grasp of quantum measurement and wavefunction collapse.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the original paper by Jönsson C (1961) on electron diffraction.
  • Study the implications of wavefunction collapse in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the concept of indistinguishability in quantum particles.
  • Investigate modern variations of the double-slit experiment and their findings.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the foundational experiments that illustrate the principles of quantum theory.

very_curious
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hi,

not sure if this is the right section, but I'll post this here anyway. I'm after some specific details of the famous double slit experiment with electrons:

1. How wide are the slits?
2. How far apart are the slits?
3. What is the barrier (i.e. around the slit) made of?
4. How can we test if the electrons hitting the screen are the same electrons that left the 'gun'?

Any help would be great :)

Thanks,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
very_curious said:
1. How wide are the slits?
2. How far apart are the slits?
3. What is the barrier (i.e. around the slit) made of?
4. How can we test if the electrons hitting the screen are the same electrons that left the 'gun'?

I think the abstract of the original paper answers questions 1-3:
A glass plate covered with an evaporated silver film of about 200 Angstrom thickness is irradiated by a line-shaped electron-probe in a vacuum of 10^-4 Torr. A hydrocarbon
polymerisation film of very low electrical conductivity is formed at places
subjected to high electron current density. An electrolytically deposited copper
film leaves these places free from copper. When the copper film is stripped a grating
with slits free of any material is obtained. 50 microns long and 0.3 microns wide slits with a
grating constant of 1 micron are obtained. The maximum number of slits is five.
The electron diffraction pattern obtained using these slits in an arrangement
analogous to Young's light optical interference experiment in the Fraunhofer plane
and Fresnel region shows an effect corresponding to the well-known interference
phenomena in light optics.

This was taken from Jönsson C,(1961) Zeitschrift für Physik, 161:454–474 (the paper itself is in German). Wikipedia also gives a reference to "Jönsson C (1974). Electron diffraction at multiple slits. American Journal of Physics, 4:4–11", which surely is in English.

The "shut up and calculate"-style answer to the 4th question would be that electrons are quantum particles, therefore indistinguishable! Perhaps somebody else can offer a better and more philosophical answer :)
 
Last edited:
"How can we test if the electrons hitting the screen are the same electrons that left the 'gun'?"

The electron beam can be slowed to a rate equivalent to around 10 electrons per second, so in viewing it as a true particle it is obvious that the electron left the gun, went through one of the slits and hit the screen. The electron could not have interfered with another electron. The same way bullets from a gun could not interfere with each other. But in reality they do interfere with each other, or at least the electron somehow interferes with itself to produce the interference pattern. The idea of which electron left the gun and which one hit the screen gets a little fuzzy because we can't measure it without collapsing the wavefunction and thereby determining which one left the gun and which one hit the screen.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K