I Detecting Interference Patterns with Large Objects: The Double Slit Experiment

john taylor
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
Why is it so difficult to detect interference patterns with larger objects in the double slit experiment(e.g. bacteria)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
john taylor said:
Why is it so difficult to detect interference patterns with larger objects in the double slit experiment(e.g. bacteria)?

One way to look at it is to use the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle for the y-direction is:

##\sigma_y \sigma_p \ge \frac{\hbar}{2}##

If we define the y-velocity as ##v = \frac{p}{m}##, then we have:

##\sigma_v \ge \frac{\hbar}{2m} \sigma_y##

If ##m## is large, then you have very little uncertainty in the y-velocity of the particle. Effectively, you have a classical trajectory through the slit.

For an electron, ##m## is relatively small, so you get a larger uncertainty in the y-velocity, which is necessary for the interference pattern to emerge.

Note that this applies equally to single-slit experiments.
 
what would it take to replicate the double slit experiment with larger objects such as microorganisms?
 
john taylor said:
what would it take to replicate the double slit experiment with larger objects such as microorganisms?

You can't. They are just too big. According to Wikipedia:

The experiment can be done with entities much larger than electrons and photons, although it becomes more difficult as size increases. The largest entities for which the double-slit experiment has been performed were molecules that each comprised 810 atoms (whose total mass was over 10,000 atomic mass units).[1][2]
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Back
Top