Double Slit Experiment: Dumb question that needs to be asked

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the double slit experiment, specifically addressing the effects of observation and measurement on the resulting interference pattern of electrons. Participants explore the implications of monitoring methods, including whether human observation influences the outcome, and the nature of interactions involved in the measurement process.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that measuring which slit an electron passes through destroys the interference pattern, leading to a particle-like distribution instead of a wave-like interference pattern.
  • Others clarify that the human eye does not play a role in the measurement process; rather, it is the interaction of light with the electrons that affects the coherence and thus the interference pattern.
  • A participant mentions "weak measurement" as a concept that attempts to observe without disturbing the quantum state significantly.
  • There is a contention regarding the necessity of interaction for determining which-slit information, with some arguing that mere potential knowledge of the path is sufficient to alter the outcome.
  • Participants discuss the role of polarizers in the experiment, noting that their alignment affects whether interference occurs, with some claiming that interaction with polarizers does not change the quantum nature of the wave.
  • One participant explains that it is possible to restore the interference pattern by manipulating the polarizer setup, which highlights the quantum nature of the experiment.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role of observation and measurement in the double slit experiment. There is no consensus on whether the human eye or the measurement process fundamentally alters the interference pattern, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of various measurement techniques.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying interpretations of measurement and observation in quantum mechanics, as well as the dependence on specific experimental setups, such as the use of polarizers and the nature of light interactions with electrons.

  • #61
sillyputty said:
I don't think of it as separate.
In other words, you're ignoring the actual physics. The whole point is that the pattern you get with orthogonal polarizers at each slit (i.e., "which-way information") is different from the pattern you get with no polarizers. That's why we call the first a "diffraction pattern" (or two of them, one for each slit) and the second an "interference pattern". Thinking of them as "the same" is a misrepresentation of the physics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrChinese

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
55
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
613
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K