Determinant of row interchange proof

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter fackert
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinant Proof Row
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that for an nxn matrix A, interchanging two rows results in the determinant of the new matrix B being equal to -detA. The basis case for n=2 is established, demonstrating that detB equals -detA for a 2x2 matrix. The user seeks assistance with the induction step, specifically for a kxk matrix. A suggestion is made to utilize a pre-multiplication matrix that swaps the rows and apply the property det(A*B) = det(A)*det(B) to facilitate the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix determinants
  • Familiarity with mathematical induction
  • Knowledge of matrix transformations
  • Basic linear algebra concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of determinants, specifically the effect of row operations
  • Learn about pre-multiplication matrices and their applications in linear algebra
  • Review mathematical induction techniques in the context of linear algebra proofs
  • Examine additional resources on determinants, such as the provided notes from the University of Georgia
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in linear algebra, mathematicians focusing on matrix theory, and anyone involved in mathematical proofs related to determinants.

fackert
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Need a lot of help here guys.

I need to prove that for an nxn matrix A, if i interchange two rows to obtain B, then det=-detA

I have proved my basis (below), but I'm stuck on the hard part, the induction (which I'm required to do). I understand the steps of induction, but i don't know how to do it for this case.

What i have so far:

Let A be an nxn matrix.
Basis n=2
Then detA=a(11)a(22) - a(12)a(21)
Now let B be the matrix obtained by interchanging rows 1 and 2
Then detB=a(21)a(12) - a(22)a(11)
=-detA
So true for an arbitary 2x2 matrix.

(induction)
Assume true for n=k
For a kxk matrix...?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey fackert.

Try introducing a pre-multiplication matrix that swaps the rows and then use the relationship that det(A*B) = det(A)*det(B) where B is your original matrix and A is a matrix transformation that swaps the rows.
 
my notes on determinants are on page 62ff of these notes:

http://www.math.uga.edu/%7Eroy/4050sum08.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K