Determinant of the variance-covariance matrix

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kingwinner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinant Matrix
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 11K views
kingwinner
Messages
1,266
Reaction score
0
Let ∑ be the variance-covariance matrix of a random vector X. The first component of X is X1, and the second component of X is X2.

Then det(∑)=0
<=> the inverse of ∑ does not exist

<=> there exists c≠0 such that

a.s.
d=(c1)(X1)+(c2)(X2) (i.e. (c1)(X1)+(c2)(X2) is equal to some constant d almost surely)
=======================

I don't understand the last part. Why is it true? How can we prove it?

Any help is appreciated!:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Write
[tex] \sigma = \begin{bmatrix} \sigma_1^2 & \sigma_{12}\\ \sigma_{21} & \sigma_2^2\end{bmatrix}[/tex]

and then write down the expression for its determinant, noting that it equals zero.

Now, take

[tex] D = c_1X_1 + c_2X_2[/tex]

and use the usual rules to write out the variance of [tex]D[/tex] in terms of [tex]c_1, c_2[/tex] and the elements of [tex]\sigma[/tex].

Compare the determinant to the expression just obtained - you should see that why the statement is true.