Determinants in quadratics and the range of y

In summary, the goal is to find the range of y in the quadratic equation x^2+2x+3=y using the determinant b^2-4ac. The determinant must be equal to or greater than 0 in order for the equation to have at least one real solution. This is because the vertex of the parabola, which represents the minimum or maximum value of y, occurs when the discriminant is 0. This understanding allows us to solve the original problem and find the range of y.
  • #1
nobahar
497
2

Homework Statement


I need to find the range for y in the quadratic [tex]x^2+2x+3=y[/tex]
Using the determinant [tex]b^2-4ac [/tex] where [tex]ax^2+bx+c[/tex]

Homework Equations


[tex]x^2+2x+3=y[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


Okay, so:
To use the determinant [tex] y=0, x^2+2x+3=0[/tex], in which case [tex] b^2-4.a.c = -8 [/tex]
So there are no real roots (I'm still unsure whether this is of any use anyway, unless the determinant =0, in which case I would have the maximum or minimum for the function and therefore the range would be from this point onwards, i.e. y>=0 or y<=0). But since there are no real roots...
However,
[tex]x^2+2x+3=y[/tex] gives [tex]x^2+2x+3-y=0[/tex], in which case the determinant, [tex]2^2-4.1.(3-y)=4-12+4y[/tex]
Now the book suggests that this determinant should be an inequality, namely >=0, but surely, as I have subtracted y, the determinant should equal zero: -8+4y=0?
I don't think I've understood what's going on, but hopefully my attempt highlights my misundertstanding. I can solve the problem following the guideline, but I want to know WHY it is the way the book says. It seems, by subtracting y, Iam in essence 'moving the graph down' (?), although all values of course yield 0, as y is a variable (and the equation says so!). But by subtracting y and using the determinant, I am somehow identifying the lowest value for y, and shouldn't the determinant =0; after all, there can't be more than one root...
I hope this is clear, I really need to get this, so I can elaborate or alter the wording or something if its not clear...
Thanks everyone.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It's actually called the discriminant (determinant is a matrix thing). But anyway: by subtracting y you are indeed moving the graph down, and the point of that is to move it down far enough that it intersects the horizontal axis. If y takes the precise value that moves the curve down just far enough to touch the x axis, then yes, the discriminant will be zero. But you're forgetting about the possibility of y taking a larger value, and in that case there would be two roots since you've moved the graph so far down that its minimum actually lies below the axis. The discriminant would then be positive. That's why the book tells you to use an inequality.

Hopefully that helps a little - I know it's not the clearest explanation.
 
  • #3
ohhh, so I could keep making y larger in the DISCRIMINANT (oops!:blushing:), [tex]-8+4y[/tex] until it hits the x-axis, at disc=o, which gives one root, for the minimun value of y, and then passes through the x-axis, disc>0, which gives all subsequent values of y, with two roots, and hence the range of y?
Thanks, it was nice and clear, and thanks for the speedy response!
 
  • #4
nobahar said:

Homework Statement


I need to find the range for y in the quadratic [tex]x^2+2x+3=y[/tex]
Using the determinant [tex]b^2-4ac [/tex] where [tex]ax^2+bx+c[/tex]

Homework Equations


[tex]x^2+2x+3=y[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


Okay, so:
To use the determinant [tex] y=0, x^2+2x+3=0[/tex], in which case [tex] b^2-4.a.c = -8 [/tex]
So there are no real roots (I'm still unsure whether this is of any use anyway, unless the determinant =0, in which case I would have the maximum or minimum for the function and therefore the range would be from this point onwards, i.e. y>=0 or y<=0). But since there are no real roots...
However,
[tex]x^2+2x+3=y[/tex] gives [tex]x^2+2x+3-y=0[/tex], in which case the determinant, [tex]2^2-4.1.(3-y)=4-12+4y[/tex]
Now the book suggests that this determinant should be an inequality, namely >=0, but surely, as I have subtracted y, the determinant should equal zero: -8+4y=0?
I don't think I've understood what's going on, but hopefully my attempt highlights my misundertstanding. I can solve the problem following the guideline, but I want to know WHY it is the way the book says. It seems, by subtracting y, Iam in essence 'moving the graph down' (?), although all values of course yield 0, as y is a variable (and the equation says so!). But by subtracting y and using the determinant, I am somehow identifying the lowest value for y, and shouldn't the determinant =0; after all, there can't be more than one root...
I hope this is clear, I really need to get this, so I can elaborate or alter the wording or something if its not clear...
Thanks everyone.
Yep, "discriminant", not "determinant". There will be two real roots if the discriminant is positive, none if the discrimant is negative and exactly one (a double root) if the discrimant is zero. Now, think about what the graph of [itex]y= x^2[/itex] looks like! It is a parabola going down to a vertex, then back up again. Drawing horizontal lines you should see that the parabola crosses the line twice (two real roots) if the line is above the vertex, does not cross the line (no real roots) if the line is above the vertex, and exactly one root if the horizontal line is at the vertex.

That is, the vertex occurs at that value of y that gives one root: that makes the discriminant 0, exactly as you say. So: what value of y makes 4- 12+ 4y= 0?
 
  • #5
nobahar said:
Now the book suggests that this determinant should be an inequality, namely >=0, but surely, as I have subtracted y, the determinant should equal zero: -8+4y=0?

No, your reasoning does not sound good, subtracting y does not means that the discriminant should be 0.

Ok, so the book ask you to find the range of y, in x2 + 2x + 3 = y. Right?

So, say y0 is in that range, that means, there exists some x0, such that: x02 + 2x0 + 3 = y0.

Or in another word, the equation: x2 + 2x + 3 - y0 = 0 must have at least one solution (one of the solution(s) must be x0)

So, to find the range of y in that problem, we have to find all y, which makes the equation: x2 + 2x + 3 - y = 0 have at least one solution, which means, the discriminant of this equation must be equal or greater than 0.

Hope I'm being clear enough. :)

If you find anywhere unclear, don't hesitate to ask. :)
 
  • #6
Thanks VietDao. I think I got it: and if this is so, then my second post is consistent with your response.
HallsofIvy: the only value y can take is 2. Forgive me if this is not the question!
Thanks for the responses.
 

1. What are determinants in quadratics?

Determinants in quadratics refer to the value that is used to determine the nature of the roots (real or imaginary) of a quadratic equation. It is calculated by using the coefficients of the quadratic equation and can help in finding the solutions for the equation.

2. How do you calculate the determinant in a quadratic equation?

The determinant in a quadratic equation can be calculated by using the formula: b²-4ac, where a, b, and c are the coefficients of the quadratic equation. This formula is also known as the discriminant and can help in determining the nature of the roots (real or imaginary) of the equation.

3. What is the range of y in a quadratic equation?

The range of y in a quadratic equation is the set of all possible values that the dependent variable (y) can take on. In other words, it is the set of all possible outputs for a given input in the quadratic equation. The range can be determined by graphing the equation or by using the discriminant to find the nature of the roots.

4. Can the range of y in a quadratic equation be negative?

Yes, the range of y in a quadratic equation can be negative. This can happen when the quadratic equation has a negative coefficient for the squared term (a) and the discriminant is positive, indicating that the equation has two real, but negative, solutions. In this case, the range of y will include negative values.

5. How can determinants in quadratics be applied in real-life situations?

Determinants in quadratics can be applied in various real-life situations, such as in physics, engineering, and finance. For example, in physics, determinants can help in calculating the maximum height and distance of a projectile. In engineering, they can be used to find the roots of a system of equations. In finance, they can help in calculating the break-even point for a business.

Similar threads

  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
23
Views
434
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
498
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
243
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
218
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
721
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
511
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
447
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
540
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
19
Views
787
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
986
Back
Top