Determine the mean of the position <x> in a state

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves expressing the position operator \(\hat{x}\) in terms of ladder operators \(a_{+}\) and \(a_{-}\), and determining the mean position \(\left\langle x \right\rangle\) for a given quantum state \(\left| \psi \right\rangle\). The context is set within the framework of quantum mechanics, specifically dealing with the harmonic oscillator model.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the expression of the position operator and attempt to calculate the mean position using the provided state. There are questions about the application of ladder operators and the implications of using them on specific states. Some participants express confusion regarding the calculations and seek clarification on the use of orthogonality in the eigenstates.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants offering hints and guidance on how to approach the problem without integrals. There is acknowledgment of potential confusion in calculations, and some participants express a sense of progress in understanding the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of quantum operators and eigenstates, with specific attention to the implications of using ladder operators on states not represented in the original problem. There is a focus on the orthogonality of eigenstates as a method to simplify the problem.

Ylle
Messages
77
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello everyone...

I'm kinda stuck with a problem I'm trying to do.
The problem states:

Express the operator \hat{x} by the ladder operators a_{+} and a_{-}, and determine the mean of the position \left\langle x \right\rangle in the state \left| \psi \right\rangle.

Homework Equations


\left| \psi \right\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\left| 3 \right\rangle + \left| 2 \right\rangle)

Hamiltonian for a one dimensional harmonic oscillator:

\hat{H} = \frac{\hat{p}^{2}}{2m}+\frac{1}{2}mw^{2}\hat{x}^{2},
where w is the oscillators frequency, and x and p are the operators for position and momentum. The normalized energy eigenfunctions for H is denoted \left| n \right\rangle, where n = 0,1,2,... so that:

\hat{H}\left| n \right\rangle = (n + \frac{1}{2})\hbarw\left| \psi \right\rangle

The Attempt at a Solution


The first is easy, since:

\hat{x} = \sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2mw}}(a_{+} + a_{-}).

My problem is finding the mean of the position.

I tried to do it like this:

\left\langle x \right\rangle = \sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2mw}}\int \psi^{*}_{n}(a_{+} + a_{-})\psi_{n} dx

And that didn't go well. It got very confusing, so I was not sure if I was on the right track or not. So here I am.

I know the answer should be:

\left\langle x \right\rangle = \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{mw}},
but again, I'm kinda lost atm.

So I was hoping any of you could give me a clue. Something in my heads tells me it's pretty simple, but I really can't figure it out right now, so :)Regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: what are
a_+\lvert n\rangle
and
a_-\lvert n\rangle
equal to?
 
diazona said:
Hint: what are
a_+\lvert n\rangle
and
a_-\lvert n\rangle
equal to?
a_+ \lvert n\rangle = \sqrt{n+1} \lvert n+1\rangle
and
a_- \lvert n\rangle = \sqrt{n} \lvert n-1\rangle

I think I did something like that, but as I said. I may have messed it up. But I was right with the thought I had ? I just need to redo the math perhaps ?
 
The idea is to do the problem without resorting to doing any integrals. Just use the orthogonality of the eigenstates. For example,

\langle 1|a_+|0 \rangle = \langle 1|\sqrt{1}|1\rangle = 1
 
vela said:
The idea is to do the problem without resorting to doing any integrals. Just use the orthogonality of the eigenstates. For example,

\langle 1|a_+|0 \rangle = \langle 1|\sqrt{1}|1\rangle = 1
Hmmm... I think I may have it now. But what if the ladder operators are used on state |3> fx. ? At least the a+ operator. Then it would raise it to state 4, but that state isn't represented here, so will that just equal 0, or... ?
 
Yes, that term will drop out.
 
Thank you very much. I thought it was what I did to start with, but I just messed it up.
But I got it now :)

Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K