Determine the number of particles transmitted by S-G analyzer

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a beam of identical neutral particles with spin 1/2 passing through two Stern-Gerlach analyzers that measure spin along the z-axis. The goal is to determine the distance required for only 25% of the particles transmitted by the first analyzer to be transmitted by the second analyzer, with the particles traveling at speed v0 between the analyzers in a uniform magnetic field oriented in the x-direction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Rabi's formula to determine the probability of spin-flip transitions. There is an exploration of the implications of the particles traveling along the y-axis and how it relates to the Hamiltonian. Some participants suggest expressing the initial state in different bases to facilitate calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, checking assumptions about the direction of travel and the nature of the particles. Some have confirmed the correctness of the probability equation derived, while others are considering the implications of their calculations and how to extract the necessary time variable.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the specific characteristics of the neutral particles and how that affects the calculations. Participants are also navigating the implications of the uniform magnetic field and its orientation on the system's dynamics.

acdurbin953
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A beam of identical neutral particles with spin 1/2 travels along the y-axis. The beam passes through a series of two Stern-Gerlach spin analyzing magnets, each of which is designed to analyze the spin projection along the z-axis. The first Stern-Gerlach analyzer only allows particles with spin up (along the z-axis) to pass through. The second SternGerlach analyzer only allows particles with spin down (along the z-axis) to pass through. The particles travel at speed v0 between the two analyzers, which are separated by a region of length d in which there is a uniform magnetic field B pointing in the x-direction. Determine the smallest value of d such that only 25% of the particles transmitted by the first analyzer are transmitted by the second analyzer.

Homework Equations


Rabi's formula: In this instance I said w0 = 0, so the probability is given by P+→- = sin2(w1t/2)

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that I want 25% of the particles to come out of the second analyzer. Since both analyzers measure along the z-axis, and go from spin-up to spin-down, I have been trying to solve this using Rabi's formula for spin-flip. I set P+→- = sin2(w1t/2) = 1/4.

However, I am now feeling stuck and I think I have missed some things along the way:
1st: I forgot that the particles are said to be traveling along the y-axis, and I don't know if this matters in the problem. I currently have the input state before the particles enter the B-field as |ψ(0)> = |+>.

2nd: I need to solve for the distance, so I need to find the value of t from solving P+→- = 1/4. But I don't know what to use for my value of w1. For an electron I see that w = eB/me, but I don't know what to use for these neutral particles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It will be useful to write the states involved in the problem such that spin states along a certain direction are distinguished from the other directions. For example, I propose to use ##|z;\pm\rangle## to denote the states along ##z## direction.
So, in the beginning (after the first SG) the state is ##|z;+\rangle##. Then it propagates through a region of uniform magnetic field oriented along ##x## direction. Which means, this intermediate region is associated with the time evolution operator ##U = \exp\left(-i\omega\frac{S_x}{\hbar}t\right)##. Now apply this operator to the initial state, namely ##U|z;+\rangle##. Hint: to do this calculation, make use of the completeness relation for ##|x;\pm\rangle##.
acdurbin953 said:
1st: I forgot that the particles are said to be traveling along the y-axis, and I don't know if this matters in the problem. I currently have the input state before the particles enter the B-field as |ψ(0)> = |+>.
It does not matter because the direction of the travel does not affect the Hamiltonian.
acdurbin953 said:
but I don't know what to use for these neutral particles.
Since, the particle is unknown, I think you can leave the answer in term of ##\omega##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: acdurbin953
Thank for the insight that the direction does not affect the Hamiltonian - I hadn't realized that.

Starting from the beginning, I let my prepared state be |ψ(0)> = |+>.
This enters the B-field and since the probability is dependent on time, I need to apply U = eiωt/2 to my time evolved state |ψ(t)>.
If I catch you drift, I should write |ψ(0)> in the x basis at this point? So |ψ(0)> = 1/√2 (|+> + |->).
Then the time evolved state passing through the B-field before it enters the second analyzer is |ψ(t)> = 1/√2 * (e-iωt/2 |+> + eiωt/2 |->)
The probability I am looking for with this state coming from the second analyzer is then |<-|ψ(t)>|2.
Next I applied Euler's, and the probability becomes P- = 1/2 |cos(ωt/2) + isin(ωt/2)|2 = 1/4

Is that looking correct? I am not sure what to do about all of the cos and sin terms I end up with when I square what is inside the abs value. It doesn't seem there is a clean way to extract t. Should I not use Euler's?
 
Alright, actually after some check ups, the equation you already have from the final probability ##P_-(t) = \sin^2(\omega t/2)## is correct. If you want to follow step-by-step calculation, you will end up with that formula. So it's up to you whether you want to directly use the given formula or to firstly derive it. Either way, the equation you have is
$$
P_-(t) = \sin^2(\omega t/2) = \frac{1}{4}
$$
and you are asked to find the minimum value of ##t## such that ##t>0##. It should be easy.
 
Right - yeah if the original equation I had used is correct I'll stick with that. Thanks for your help!
 
is the answer w.r.t. v0??
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K