MHB Determine the probability of winning a game of craps by rolling a sum of 6

anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
I'm aware that the

P( winning a game of craps by rolling a sum of 6)
=P(getting 6 the first time and 6 the second time) or

P(getting 6 the first time, get some number other than 6 and 7 the second time and get 6 again the third time) or

P((getting 6 the first time, get some number other than 6 and 7 the second and third time and get 6 again the fourth time)...

the sequence continues in such a manner infinitely (this is to say that we're having an infinite sum of a geometric sequence)

= $((\frac{2!}{36}\times2)+\frac{1}{36})+ S_\infty$

=$\frac{5}{36}+ \frac{(\frac{5}{36})^2}{1-\frac{25}{36}}$

=$\frac{5}{36}+ \frac{25}{396}$

=$\frac{20}{99}$

But a quick goggle search shows that I don't have to consider the infinite sequence and the probability of winning a game of craps by rolling a sum of 6 for the third time and so on is simply

$\frac{P(winning \;a \;game \;f \;craps \;by \;rolling \;a \;sum \;of \;6 }{P(winning \;or \;losing)}=\frac{\frac{5}{36}}{\frac{5}{36}+\frac{1}{36}}=\frac{5}{11}$

Therefore,

P( winning a game of craps by rolling a sum of 6)
=P( winning a game of craps by rolling a sum of 6 the second time) and P(winning a game of craps by rolling a sum of 6 on the third time and so on)
=$\frac{5}{36}\times\frac{5}{11}=\frac{25}{369}$

Finally,
P( winning a game of craps by rolling a sum of 6)=$\frac{5}{36}+ \frac{25}{396}=\frac{20}{99}$

I can't quite get my head around that fact. It has confused rather than enlighten me.

Could someone please explain to me why this works?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi anemone,

I'm not sure I understand exactly which part you're having trouble with, but I'm going to assume that it's how you can avoid summing the infinite series-- i.e., how we can find that the probability of rolling a 6 before rolling a 7 is 5/11. (I'm skipping the part about rolling a 6 on your first roll.)

So let's say \( p \) is the probability of rolling 6 before you roll a 7. On the first roll, there are three possibilities:
(1) With probability 5/36, you roll a 6. Hurray! If this happens, your probability of success is 1.
(2) With probability 6/36, you roll a 7. Sob! If this happens, your probability of success is 0.
(3) With probability 25/36, you roll something else. Now you are right back where you started, and your probability of (eventual) success is \( p \).

So $$ p = (5/36) \cdot 1 + (6/36) \cdot 0 + (25/36) \cdot p $$
This is an equation which you can solve easily, with the result \( p = 5/11 \).
 
:)
Yes, I mean to ask how one can avoid summing the infinite series.
It makes a lot of sense now!
Thanks for the kind and great explanation!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top