Determine whether the following series converges

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chadlee88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
Chadlee88
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Could someone please explain how they got from step 1 to step 2, i don't know what hap'd to the factorial part :S

Question: Determine whether the following series converges.

n= infinity
Sum ln (n)
n=1 n!

Using the Ratio Test: lim absolute ((An+1)/(An))
n->infinity

Step 1. => lim (ln(n+1)/(n+1)!) x (n!/(ln (n))

Step 2. => lim ln(n+1)/((n+1)ln(n))


Link to solution: http://www.maths.uq.edu.au/courses/MATH1051/Semester2/Tutorials/prob9sol.pdf

It's question 1. vi)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
n!/(n + 1)! = 1/(n + 1).

If you write out the factorials for n = 1, 2, 3 you should see why this is the case.
 
Using this equality e^x >= x + 1 > x for all x, we have e^n > n for all n. Thus, ln(n) < n for all n. This implies 0 < ln(n)/n! < 1/(n-1)! for all n>1
The series (Sum 1/(n-1)!) is convergent, so is the series (Sum ln(n)/n!)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top