Determining Adsorption of CO2 with Microporous Polymer

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on a method for determining the adsorption of CO2 onto microporous polymer (MP) using a Schlenk flask. The proposed method involves measuring the weight change of the MP before and after CO2 exposure, while also considering potential contamination from air and the risk of CO2 desorption during vacuum application. Participants recommend exploring gas adsorption experiments and studying BET and Langmuir theories to enhance understanding of the adsorption process and improve the experimental design.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of microporous polymers (MP)
  • Familiarity with Schlenk flask usage
  • Knowledge of gas adsorption principles
  • Basic concepts of BET and Langmuir theories
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "gas adsorption experiment" for practical methodologies
  • Study BET theory for surface area analysis
  • Examine Langmuir theory for adsorption isotherms
  • Investigate alternative methods for measuring gas adsorption, such as pressure change techniques
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, chemists, and materials scientists interested in gas adsorption processes, particularly those working with microporous materials and seeking to optimize experimental methods for measuring CO2 adsorption.

Sancho Panza
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am trying to come up with a easy method of determining amount of gas, in this case CO2 adsorbed onto a solid adsorbent. The adsorbent i am going to use is microporous polymer (MP).

So, if it has to be as simple as it can be, I think I should measure change in weight. At this point I am thinking about using Schlenk flask, in which i would place MP, heat it up and then suck out the air out of the flask and make vacuum. This process should cleanse the MP of any adsorbed air. What I want to do next, is measure weight of clean MP and then fill the flask with CO2, and let it "sit" there for a time in which all surface of MP should be covered in layers of CO2. After this I would once again make vacuum inside of the flask and measure the weight of now occupied MP, then it is just matter of calculations.

And finally my questions are, could this method work? I am aware that while adding the CO2 I might have it contaminated with air, but would be the contamination insignificant enough to the point I can just not count with it? Also the part of my plan I am not sure is good idea, is when I would try to make vacuum 2nd time to measure the change in weight, because I think that while sucking the air out, a desorption might occur and lead to loss of some adsorbed CO2. Should I rather try to measure the change of pressure to get information on how much CO2 is adsorbed (well, if it could work this way)? Any ideas how to improve this method or just completely forget it find a new way?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Sancho Panza said:
Also the part of my plan I am not sure is good idea, is when I would try to make vacuum 2nd time to measure the change in weight, because I think that while sucking the air out, a desorption might occur and lead to loss of some adsorbed CO2.
This will be your biggest problem.

Sancho Panza said:
Should I rather try to measure the change of pressure to get information on how much CO2 is adsorbed (well, if it could work this way)?
Yes. Look up "gas adsorption experiment" for experimental details, and you might want to look at BET theory and Langmuir theory for the theory behind gas adsorption on a surface.
 
TeethWhitener said:
This will be your biggest problem.Yes. Look up "gas adsorption experiment" for experimental details, and you might want to look at BET theory and Langmuir theory for the theory behind gas adsorption on a surface.
Thanks! I got my hands on very interesting articles about my problems.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K