Determining Elliptical-ness of Data: A Statistical Approach?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Aaron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Data
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the "elliptical-ness" of data sets constrained to elliptical bounds. The initial approach involves mean-centering, normalizing data, and calculating angles relative to the origin, but struggles with circular data. A statistical method for assessing fit to elliptical bounds in n-dimensional ellipsoids is sought. Suggested methods include using R² statistics from elliptical regression on boundary points and referencing specific papers for more complex approaches.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mean-centering and normalization techniques
  • Familiarity with statistical distributions and hypothesis testing
  • Knowledge of elliptical regression and R² statistics
  • Basic proficiency in data visualization techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "elliptical regression methods" for fitting data to ellipses
  • Explore "n-dimensional ellipsoids" and their statistical properties
  • Study the "R² statistic" in the context of regression analysis
  • Review the methodologies presented in the papers linked in the discussion
USEFUL FOR

Data scientists, statisticians, and researchers working with multivariate data analysis and seeking to assess the fit of data to elliptical models.

Aaron
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
"Elliptical-ness" of Data

I have sets of data that ideally should be constrained to elliptical bounds. I am looking for a method to see how elliptical a set of data is. My inital approach involved mean-centering and normalizing my data, calculating the angle of the point relative to the origin, finding the frequency distribution of this data and comparing it to a standard distribution. Graphically this works well for clearly elliptical data, but as the data approaches a circular bound (which is also valid) the distribution becomes flat and the comparison poor.

Is there a good statistical way to determine how well a set of data is fit by a elliptical bound? What methods are available for n-dimensional ellipsoids?

Please let me know if you need any more details and thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think this is not an easy task, especially because the alternative hypothesis can be varied -- as opposed to "ellipse vs. sphere" (which is what your test sounds well-suited for) or even "(sphere or ellipse) ['spherellipse'?] vs. uniform."

In the case of the alternative hypothesis "spherellipse vs. uniform," you can compare your statistic against the uniform distribution; but that would not be a useful test when the data are neither spherelliptical nor uniform.

An approach that might be helpful is described here: http://ciks.cbt.nist.gov/~garbocz/paper134/mono134.html

I may be thinking of the problem as more complicated that it actually is; if so, please let me know.

Another potential approach is: http://www.nlreg.com/ellipse.htm Suppose you "peel" the outermost "crust" of your data, then apply this procedure to these boundary points. The R^2 statistic of the elliptical regression would be a test of how well an ellipse fits to the outer boundary of the data.
 
Last edited:
In what I'm doing, after applying a transformation I would like to see the data in some sort of ellipse (circle valid of course). Often when the transformation is bad, I get plots representing Xs or ellipses with Xs through them. I was hoping for some statistically valid method to do this, but I like the idea of regressing the outer "crust" of points, that should really be sufficient for what I'm doing. I'll give that a shot and see if I like it. That first paper you linked to seems a bit more involved, but I'll take a look at that if the other method doesn't work.

Thanks for the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K