MHB Determining ratio of a 2 part mix

  • Thread starter Thread starter rustyskills
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ratio
rustyskills
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Mechanically reconditioned sand weighs 8.50#/gallon
Thermally reclaimed sand weighs 8.89#/gallon
A mix of these two kinds of sand weighs 8.78#/gallon
What is the % thermal and %mechanical in the mix?

I work in a foundry and we feed these two types of sand into a hopper that feeds a mixer. It's important to have a quick and reliable test that can be done on the shop floor that confirms that the mix is 60/40 or 70/30 etc.

I looked at a lot of calculators and examples online but didn't find any that fit the data I have collected. I sure would appreciate some help. Anyone want to set me straight on this? Thx
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Let's let $M$ be the percentage of mechanically reconditioned sand and $T$ be the percentage of thermally reconditioned sand.

So, we know that:

$$M+T=100$$

And we also know:

$$850M+889T=87800$$

Solving this system, we find:

$$M=\frac{1100}{39}\approx28.2,\,T=\frac{2800}{39}\approx71.8$$

You could also state:

$$M:T=11:28$$
 
modern day (math) warrior, mean mean stride...
thank you. I can duplicate that but I don't fully understand it yet.
I get the 850M + 889T = 87800
can you show me a little more about how you got to the rest?
much appreciated.
 
Suppose we take the first equation:

$$M+T=100$$

and multiply it by $-850$, so that it becomes:

$$-850M-850T=-85000$$

Now, recall we have:

$$850M+889T=87800$$

Adding these two equation, we will eliminate $M$, to get:

$$39T=2800$$

which gives us:

$$T=\frac{2800}{39}$$

And then taking the original first equation, and using this value for $T$, we have:

$$M=100-\frac{2800}{39}=\frac{1100}{39}$$
 
There it is! I guess this answers the age old question "Why do I have to learn this- I'll never use it." Math in the foundry... I thank you.
I still have some R&R concerns regarding sampling technique but we can easily test and measure that. The roadblock was the calculation of the mix and you have cleared that right up.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
8K
Back
Top