A Determining rationality of real numbers represented by prime digit sequence

Jiketz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
The problem describes a sequence of real numbers formed by arranging prime digits in a certain pattern. If the original real number is rational, then all subsequent numbers formed from its decimal expansion are also rational. However, there exists an irrational number with the same pattern whose subsequent numbers are still rational.
I would like to know if my answer is correct and if no ,could you correct.But it should be right I hope:
Unbenanntx.png
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Thread locked. The OP has been advised to repost the question in one of the homework forum sections.
 

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Thread 'Fermat's Last Theorem'

Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
View full post »

Thread 'Useless continued fraction for 1'

I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
View full post »

Similar threads

I On base-b expansion of nonnegative reals
Replies
7
Views
2K
I How to relate multiplication of irrational numbers to real world?
Replies
7
Views
2K
I Rational sequence converging to irrational
Replies
13
Views
8K
MHB Large Prime number unable to compute
Replies
2
Views
8K
I Expressing any given point on plane with one unique number
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Basic measurement theory question
Replies
5
Views
2K
A Help needed with derivation: solving a complex double integral
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Questions regarding Kurepa's Conjecture
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Extend Euler Product Convergence Over Primes: Basic Qs
Replies
0
Views
1K
Discussion on Astronomical Prime Numbers and Re-evaluating the Primali
Replies
5
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top