Development of dimensional universe since big bang.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BernieM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Big bang Universe
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the development of dimensions in the universe since the Big Bang, exploring whether the universe began as a single-dimensional event and how additional dimensions emerged over time. Participants question the role of time in this context and consider various hypotheses regarding the nature of dimensionality in relation to energy scales.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the universe began as a single-dimensional event, gaining additional dimensions over time, and questions the role of time during this process.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about the initial claim, stating they have not encountered such a hypothesis and requests sources for further information.
  • A third participant introduces a theory proposing that the early universe was a one-dimensional line of energy that evolved into a two-dimensional plane and eventually a three-dimensional universe, acknowledging that this idea is not widely accepted.
  • A later reply provides links to original papers discussing the dimensionality of spacetime and notes that the concept of changing dimensionality based on energy scale contradicts string theory, which suggests sensitivity to extra dimensions at higher energies.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the physical reasoning behind the proposed changes in dimensionality and acknowledge that the idea is relatively new and not generally accepted.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; there are multiple competing views regarding the nature of dimensional development in the universe, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in understanding the physical reasoning behind the proposed theories and the dependence on definitions of dimensionality. There is also a lack of clarity regarding the implications of these ideas on established theories like string theory.

BernieM
Messages
280
Reaction score
6
I have seen it tossed about and I think it is generally accepted, that the universe began as a single dimensional event, at some point gaining a second dimension, then finally a third. Was time present during the entire 'event' as a co-existing diemnsion, fully developed and functional as it is today? Or did it come along at some later point in the development of the universe? Only after the three space dimensions were existent? If it was present at the 'beginning' then wouldn't the universe have been 2 dimensional? Time and 1 space dimension? When a dimension 'appears', as when the 2nd spatial dimension came into existence, did it sweep the entire universe as a wave? Happen simultaneously throughout the universe? Or did it only occur at locations where the temperature had dropped to some magical trigger value? And what of time today (4th dimension)? Is it possible that time is not currently fully what it will become? That it is in the process of 'becoming' a 4th dimension but currently isn't fully manifesting it's properties? And if time was not existent until some later point in the development/expansion of the universe, (or is not yet fully manfiest), how would that affect the big picture of the big bang or the future of the universe?
 
Space news on Phys.org
BernieM said:
I have seen it tossed about and I think it is generally accepted, that the universe began as a single dimensional event, at some point gaining a second dimension, then finally a third.
I have never heard of such a hypothesis. Can you point me at some sources?
 
"A refreshingly simple new idea has emerged in the complicated world of high energy physics. It proposes that the early universe was a one-dimensional line. Not an exploding sphere, not a chaotic ball of fire. Just a simple line of pure energy.

Over time, as that line grew, it crisscrossed and intersected itself more and more, gradually forming a tightly interwoven fabric, which, at large distances, appeared as a 2-D plane. More time passed and the 2-D universe expanded and twisted about, eventually creating a web — the 3-D universe we see today.

"


http://langa.posterous.com/new-theory-rethinks-big-bang-the-universe-add

http://www.world-science.net/othernews/110316_dimensions.htm

http://zidbits.com/2011/04/did-the-early-universe-only-have-1-dimension/

Hmmm ... ok well upon closer examination it seems that this is a recently proposed theory and perhaps not 'generally accepted' as I originally stated. But I think it would be interesting anyhow to 'explore' the possibilities of how things would work, manifest and progress in a universe that incrementally developed dimensions.
 
Here is the original paper:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1102.3434

Using the idea stated here:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.5914

As far as I can tell, the thrust of the argument is that the dimensionality (whether or not that is actual dimensionality or apparent is unclear to me) of spacetime somehow changes based on energy scale. However, this is opposite of the string theory paradigm, in which as you probe higher energies you increasingly become sensitive to these extra dimensions. In such a model, as you probe higher energies the dimensionality decreases.

Unfortunately, I can't really glean any physical reasoning behind why such a process would actually occur. But it's certainly a new idea, not generally accepted at all (seems only a handful of people have talked about it).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K