MHB Diameter of graph-usual chessboard

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diameter
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! ;)

I am given this exercise:
A graph has as vertices the $64$ squares of an usual chessboard and two squares are connected with an edge if and only if they have a common side.Which is the diameter of the graph?

I thought that the diameter is equal to $64$,but I am not sure..Could you tell me if it is right?? (Blush)(Blush)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
evinda said:
Hello! ;)

I am given this exercise:
A graph has as vertices the $64$ squares of an usual chessboard and two squares are connected with an edge if and only if they have a common side.Which is the diameter of the graph?

I thought that the diameter is equal to $64$,but I am not sure..Could you tell me if it is right?? (Blush)(Blush)

Hi! :)

I don't think so... (Worried)
What is the definition of the diameter?
 
I like Serena said:
Hi! :)

I don't think so... (Worried)
What is the definition of the diameter?

Diameter of a graph $G$ is defined to be tha largest distance between two vertices of $G$:
$$diam G= \max_{u,v \in V} d(u,v)$$
$d(u,v)$: distance of $u$ and $v$

How can I find it then?? (Thinking)
 
evinda said:
Diameter of a graph $G$ is defined to be tha largest distance between two vertices of $G$:
$$diam G= \max_{u,v \in V} d(u,v)$$
$d(u,v)$: distance of $u$ and $v$

How can I find it then?? (Thinking)

Good! :)

I like to say that the diameter is the longest shortest path.

Well, if you think it is 64, can you find a (shortest) path between 2 nodes that contains 64 edges?
What is the longest shortest path that you can find? (Wondering)
 
I like Serena said:
Good! :)

I like to say that the diameter is the longest shortest path.

Well, if you think it is 64, can you find a (shortest) path between 2 nodes that contains 64 edges?
What is the longest shortest path that you can find? (Wondering)

I don't really know (Worried) Could you give me a hint?? (Blush)
 
evinda said:
I don't really know (Worried) Could you give me a hint?? (Blush)

Well... we can only go from one square to another if those squares are next to each other.
So if we start from 1 end of the board and step to the other side, we're making 8 steps. We can't do it any faster.
That means that the diameter is at least 8.

If we start from one square and take 64 steps to get to some other square, then I think we can also find a shorter path (the distance of 2 squares is the length of the shortest path).
That means that the diameter is less than 64.

Can you find 2 squares for which it will have to take more than 8 steps to cross from the one to the other? (Wondering)
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...

Similar threads

Back
Top