Did de Broglie err in his hypothesis?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter drl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    De broglie
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Matt De Broglie’s hypothesis regarding wave-particle duality has been deemed incorrect following the advancements in quantum theory, particularly Dirac's transformation theory of 1926. The discussion emphasizes that electrons should be understood as vibrations in a field rather than as traditional particles or waves. Key concepts such as the uncertainty principle and the principle of superposition are highlighted as foundational to understanding modern quantum mechanics, superseding the outdated wave-particle duality framework.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum Field Theory fundamentals
  • Understanding of Dirac's transformation theory (1926)
  • Familiarity with the uncertainty principle
  • Knowledge of the principle of superposition
NEXT STEPS
  • Study introductory texts on Quantum Field Theory
  • Explore Dirac's transformation theory in detail
  • Research the uncertainty principle and its implications in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the principle of superposition and its role in quantum phenomena
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, quantum mechanics enthusiasts, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of modern quantum theories and their implications on traditional concepts like wave-particle duality.

drl
Messages
31
Reaction score
2
I'm a novice in this so to start with, I believe ...
[mentor's note: a personal theory posted in violation of the Physics Forums rules has been removed from this post]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi drl

I would recommend reading more into the subject and maybe reading some introductory text around quantum field theory. When electrons are described as Wave and Particle, they are simplifications that describe wave-like and particle-like behaviours, depending on how you are measuring the electron in any particular experiment; they aren't descriptions of an electron actually being a wave or a particle. If you study particle physics more deeply, you'll probably think of electrons (and in fact all particles) and not particles at all, but vibrations in a field. Analogies are really helpful to get concepts across and aid understanding, but they are also really dangerous and you won't be the first or last person to fall into the trap of taking them literally!.

Hope this helps
Matt
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: olgerm and bhobba
De Broglie was wrong. His ideas were overthrown when the correct quantum theory was developed with Dirac's transformation theory of 1926:
http://www.lajpe.org/may08/09_Carlos_Madrid.pdf

So forget all the guff you have read elsewhere which I can see from the above has really confused you.

Here is the explanation of the double slit using just QM:
http://arxiv.org/ftp/quant-ph/papers/0703/0703126.pdf

Once you have studied that we can chat about what's really going on. But basically its due to the uncertainty principle and principle of superposition - not the wave-particle duality which is an idea of limited applicability at best and maybe even downright wrong:
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0609163

Thanks
Bill
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and OCR
Love that last link Bill - have downloaded it to read tomorrow (well... realistically over a number of tomorrows!) Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba
mgkii said:
Love that last link Bill - have downloaded it to read tomorrow (well... realistically over a number of tomorrows!)

Glad you like it.

Unfortunately we get a fair number of posters here confused by standard beginner treatments and you have to, sometimes, spend a bit of time explaining beginner texts have issues.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
Posts involving some basic misunderstandigns of the Physics Forums rules about personal theories have been removed.
This thread is closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K