- #1
mainguy
- 15
- 0
Hi physics folk,
Thought you guys would be able to clarify something, self study learner here getting into quantum.
So I've just learned about the De Broglie relation and The Photoelectric effect and am bamboozled (in a good way).
The notion being that light is absorbed in packets. However I'm unclear on this, if E = hf, surely you could arrange four photons (each with 1/4 of the excitation energy of the electron) so they overlap perfectly on the electron and thus excite it, or is it literally impossible in any scenario?
Also I was thinking about whether this quantum property is intrinsic to light. If you have an atom moving relative to an observer at 0.5c, away from a beam of photons shining on the atom, then the observer notes that the moving atom sees a frequency given by the classic doppler shift, e.g. Photons with a lower frequency.
Meanwhile in the atom's frame it notes a different frequency, given by the special relativistic doppler shift. That is, the two disagree on the photons striking the electron.
However if we add the time dilation factor to the observer frame the agreement is of course perfect. However does this not indicate that the wave packet energy is not intrinsic to the wave, that is waves of a different frequency can appear to create the same excitation?
Thought you guys would be able to clarify something, self study learner here getting into quantum.
So I've just learned about the De Broglie relation and The Photoelectric effect and am bamboozled (in a good way).
The notion being that light is absorbed in packets. However I'm unclear on this, if E = hf, surely you could arrange four photons (each with 1/4 of the excitation energy of the electron) so they overlap perfectly on the electron and thus excite it, or is it literally impossible in any scenario?
Also I was thinking about whether this quantum property is intrinsic to light. If you have an atom moving relative to an observer at 0.5c, away from a beam of photons shining on the atom, then the observer notes that the moving atom sees a frequency given by the classic doppler shift, e.g. Photons with a lower frequency.
Meanwhile in the atom's frame it notes a different frequency, given by the special relativistic doppler shift. That is, the two disagree on the photons striking the electron.
However if we add the time dilation factor to the observer frame the agreement is of course perfect. However does this not indicate that the wave packet energy is not intrinsic to the wave, that is waves of a different frequency can appear to create the same excitation?