Did Sir Isaac Newton discover alchemy in his later years?

  • Thread starter Thread starter quantumcarl
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around Sir Isaac Newton's engagement with alchemy, particularly whether his interest was confined to his later years or spanned his entire life. Participants explore the nature of his alchemical studies, the implications of his findings, and the historical context of alchemy as a practice.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Historical
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that Newton's interest in alchemy was not limited to his later years, suggesting it was a lifelong pursuit.
  • Others argue that alchemy contradicts established scientific laws, implying that it lacks validity as a scientific discipline.
  • A participant mentions that Newton's unpublished works may contain significant insights into alchemy, but much of it could have been lost or destroyed.
  • There is speculation about the psychological effects of alchemy on Newton, including a potential nervous breakdown linked to his studies.
  • Some participants question the existence of any substantial discoveries made by Newton in alchemy, suggesting that he did not achieve results that could be considered valid scientific findings.
  • References to Newton's hair containing high levels of mercury are made, with implications about his health and practices during his alchemical studies.
  • Several participants express skepticism about the legitimacy of alchemy, equating it with outdated practices and suggesting it has been replaced by modern chemistry.
  • Links to external resources, such as a Nova program about Newton's alchemy, are shared for further exploration of the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the validity and outcomes of Newton's alchemical studies, with some viewing it as a serious pursuit and others dismissing it as unscientific. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the nature and significance of Newton's contributions to alchemy.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the potential loss of Newton's writings on alchemy, the ambiguity surrounding the psychological impacts of his studies, and the varying definitions of what constitutes a 'discovery' in the context of alchemy.

  • #31
Integral said:
Start with http://aether.lbl.gov/www/tour/elements/stellar/stellar_b.html"

According to http://home.teleport.com/~salad/4god/elements.htm" even god aproves of element formation inside of stars.

http://origins.jpl.nasa.gov/library/poster/elementform3.html" seems to think heavy elements are formed at the end of a stars life.

How many more do you want?

Believe it or not modern Physics pretty well understands the strucure of the elements. It is not a mystery where they came from or how they got here. Alchemy is not the answer.

That's cool. Thank you for the reference material.

This whole disscussion about how gold is formed is a diversion away from my original question about Newton's alchemical discoveries.

I have simply stated some of my observations on gold formation. Personally, it is the alchemical work that Newton performed and why he did so that interests me... and I found some answers during the tributaries of discussion that have occurred on my thread, "Newton's Alchemy?", here.

I think I can rely on William Newman's accounts and his decifering of Newton's notes on alchemcial experiments for information with regard to the topic of my thread.

Thank you to anyone who has attempted or was going to attempt to bring some more info on Newton's alchemy to the table. I think I hear :!) and :!) calling. Cheers.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
40K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
9K