Did the Trojan War Really Happen?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter megas
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the historical existence of the Trojan War, exploring whether it actually occurred and the motivations behind it, such as the role of Helen and territorial disputes. Participants consider archaeological evidence, interpretations of historical texts, and the implications of various theories related to the war.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants believe the Trojan War likely happened, possibly due to power struggles involving Helen, while others express skepticism about the war's historical accuracy.
  • Archaeological evidence from the 1920s suggests a significant conflict at Troy around the time of Homer's narrative, but the reasons for the war remain uncertain.
  • There are claims that Helen's name may symbolize land rather than a specific person, indicating a deeper metaphorical interpretation of the story.
  • Some argue that the destruction of Troy could be viewed as part of the Dorian Invasion Period, which contributed to the decline of Mycenaean culture.
  • Concerns are raised about the methods of early archaeologists, including Schliemann, who may have destroyed important layers of evidence in their search for Troy.
  • Participants note that the narratives in Homer's works may contain fanciful elements, complicating the search for historical truth.
  • There is mention of a documentary that supports the existence of a city fitting the description of Troy, but the involvement of Greeks in a war remains uncertain.
  • Some express frustration over the lack of clarity regarding the historical events and the methods used in archaeological excavations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not reach a consensus on the historical accuracy of the Trojan War, with multiple competing views and interpretations remaining present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on interpretations of ancient texts, unresolved archaeological findings, and the challenges posed by early excavation methods that may have compromised the integrity of the archaeological record.

megas
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
First about this topic, did this really happen? what do you all think? If so, did the war start because of women? Or for land? I think that the war prolly did happen, and maybe some of the story over time, has been a little over emphasized about what really happened.. If the war did happen, i think it was because of Hellen who was married to Menelaus, and the other ruler wanted power and rule over troy. :-p
 
Science news on Phys.org
Archaeological evidence was uncovered, I believe in the 20's, that a major war that decimated the city of Troy (which had previously been thought to not even be a real city) at about the time of Homer's narrative. Whether or not it occurred because of a kidnapping of a Greek queen is another matter. I don't think that anyone really knows.
 
Someone correct me on this one but I once heard that "Helen" means "land" in Greek (or some such) so basically she's just a symbol in the story. The location of Troy is on a very heavily used trade route, so it would certainly have been grounds to start a war against a city that would tax the Greeks whenever they used it.
 
It would be better to regard the destuction of Troy as just another episode in the historically well evidenced Dorian Invasion Period, which brought about a decline in Mycenean culture.
In particular, since Agamemnon was Mycenean rather than Dorian (i.e, Greek), we might possibly regard Troy as an example of how internecine fighting among Myceneans gradually weakened them, to the point that the Dorians could destroy their culture.
 
Last edited:
ya i think that's what hellens name means, i agree thou, we will never really know if the Trojan war really happen, but why would they be saying that a war happened if it really didnt? The war was described so well, that it is very believable and had to have had happened. But we will never know, sadly..Myths will still be myths,..
 
Helen:
Possibly from either Greek helene "torch" or "corposant", or Greek selene "moon". In Greek mythology Helen was the daughter of Zeus and Leda, whose kidnapping by Paris was the cause of the Trojan War. The name was also borne by Saint Helena, mother of the Roman emperor Constantine, who supposedly found the True Cross during a trip to Jerusalem. Another famous bearer was Helen Keller, the American author and lecturer who was both blind and deaf.
http://www.behindthename.com/php/view.php?name=helen
 
loseyourname said:
Archaeological evidence was uncovered, I believe in the 20's, that a major war that decimated the city of Troy (which had previously been thought to not even be a real city) at about the time of Homer's narrative. Whether or not it occurred because of a kidnapping of a Greek queen is another matter. I don't think that anyone really knows.
In 1870 Schliemann bulldozed the mound, destroying most of the new layers in his search for the original Troy.

The story of the war is still under debate.

The best book (and a PBS series) IMHO, was done by Michael Woods, "In search of the Trojan War". I have the book, but missed the series. It appears it's available on DVD. I'm getting it.

Read the reviews, they're true, I loved the book.

 
wha? that's new... they bulldozed the mound? argh! this will still be a mystery... That book sounds interesting I am going to go check it out, thanks! :smile: idk, i just got interested when i saw troy, and brad pitt died, that was the best part :P jkjk, but ya, Evo what do you think, about the war? yes its a mystery, but everyone is intitled to their own opinion. :biggrin:
 
Early archaeology, including the excavation of Troy, was carried out by treasure hunters and amateur artifact collectors. They were not the best at what they did and their primitive methods destroyed quite a bit of the archaeological record. Professional archaeology did not even come into being until well into the 20th century.
 
  • #10
When we were reading the Oddysey, my classical civilisations teacher always told me that ther was evidence the real Troy was destroyed by an earthquake. He never went into any detail, as that wasn't the focus of our study, so I can't provide any details.
Remember- Homer's Illiad and Oddysey were fanciful stories of gods, heroes and monsters, and furthermore, in their early years were not committed to paper, but memorised and recited again ands again, and thus some original meaning was probably lost even before translation from ancient greek. How much, (if any) truth lies in them is unclear, and I'd be careful before taking any part of either book literally.
 
  • #11
Evo said:
In 1870 Schliemann bulldozed the mound, destroying most of the new layers in his search for the original Troy.

The story of the war is still under debate.

darn few bulldozers in 1870
he did dig thru the layers in a mess hunting for gold
but did prove that TROY WAS REAL :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
I saw a pretty cool documentary on Troy called "The truth of Troy" and it compared findings with Homer's story.
There seemed to be overwhelming evidence in support of a large city occupying an important strategeical position at about a similar time in the story (1700-1200 BC or something if I can remember correctly form the show).
I can't remember the details of the documentary but it was really good.
So definitely a city that fits the rough description of Troy and definitely a war, but if it involved Greeks is unknown. Battle was most likely over the position of the city as well.
Thanks Evo I might check out that book as well.
 
  • #13
Schliemann was a crackpot and bully who just happened to get something right, destroying lots of stuff because he didn't think it belonged to "his" Troy.
 
  • #14
ray b said:
darn few bulldozers in 1870
he did dig thru the layers in a mess hunting for gold
but did prove that TROY WAS REAL :smile:
Bulldozed is a term for recklessly and destructively going through something. Schliemann's method at Troy is commonly referred to as having bulldozed his way through the mound.
 
  • #15
ray b said:
darn few bulldozers in 1870
he did dig thru the layers in a mess hunting for gold
but did prove that TROY WAS REAL :smile:
Technically, 'bulldozer' was the term for the blade, not the tractor, even if the modern definition lists the only kind of bulldozer you would ever see today.

Bulldozers (the blade) were pulled by oxen or mules or some other beast long before the tractor and treads were invented. They also had more limited uses, since they didn't have nearly as much power. Normally, they were just used to spread out a fresh pile of dirt that had been dumped at the site. Plus, mule or oxen powered bulldozers didn't back up nearly as well as the modern tractor bulldozer does.

Of course, I guess that means the only mound he could have bulldozed was one he'd made himself by piling up the dirt he dug up. :rolleyes:
 
  • #16
by the way,

the troyan war was actually a battle, so it was the troyan battle. It was the longest during battle of the history, known yet for humanity.
 
  • #17
Can you provide a source to back that up?
edit- Oh, I'm guessing now that you are referring to Homer's Illiad. Never mind.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
29K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K