I Did Universal Physical Constants Exist at the Big Bang?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether universal physical constants, such as Planck's constant and the speed of light, were established at the moment of the Big Bang or if they emerged later. Participants explore the implications of these constants being absent in the early universe, questioning the nature of strong and weak nuclear forces during that time. The possibility of multiple variations of the universe is also raised, suggesting that different observers might perceive these variations differently. The uncertainty surrounding the existence of these constants at the Big Bang remains a key point of contention. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities and unknowns regarding the fundamental nature of the universe's origins.
fasteddie1371
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Re: the Big Bang. Were the universal physical constants already in place at the instant of the BB? Things like Planck's constant, the speed of light, the various mass of particles, the various force values.
Were the universal physical constants already in place at the instant of the BB? Things like Planck's constant, the speed of light, the various mass of particles, the various force values. Was it possible that the early universe ( the first couple of billionths of a second or so) existed without all the values we know today? Strong and weak nuclear forces? Or did they spring into existence as the same time as the forces and particles that are associated with?
 
Space news on Phys.org
It has been suggested that there could be many variations of 'the Universe',
some of which make more sense, and/or are more interesting than others.
To some extent depending on who is observing it.
Personally I am not convinced,
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top