Did You Know About This Neat Number Trick?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sherlockjones
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a mathematical observation related to manipulating roots and exponents, specifically examining the relationships between expressions involving cube and fifth roots. The scope includes conceptual exploration of exponent rules and their implications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant shares a numerical observation involving the manipulation of cube and fifth roots, suggesting a method of raising numbers outside the root to a power and multiplying by the inside number.
  • Another participant responds by affirming that the observation is a basic consequence of exponent rules, providing a mathematical breakdown of the reasoning.
  • A third participant expresses self-doubt regarding their understanding, indicating a personal reflection on the learning process.
  • A fourth participant counters the self-doubt by encouraging exploration in mathematics, highlighting the value of curiosity and engagement in learning.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the validity of the mathematical observation, but there is no explicit consensus on whether it is widely known or not.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not address any specific limitations or assumptions regarding the mathematical principles involved.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in mathematical concepts, particularly those exploring properties of exponents and roots, may find this discussion engaging.

sherlockjones
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Hey all

Just thought I would share something I observed:

[tex]2 \sqrt[3]{8} = \sqrt[3]{64}[/tex]Or [tex]2 \sqrt[5]{10} = \sqrt[5]{320}[/tex]

[tex]2^{5} \times 10 = 320 \rightarrow \sqrt[5]{320}[/tex]

You raise the number outside to the power, and then multiply by the inside number.

Has this already been known?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, it's a pretty basic consequence of the way that exponents work.

[itex] 2 \cdot \left( 8 \right)^{1/3} = \left( {2^3 } \right)^{1/3} \cdot \left( 8 \right)^{1/3} = \left( {2^3 \cdot 8} \right)^{1/3} = \left( {64} \right)^{1/3} [/itex]

- Warren
 
wow I am an idiot. Thanks for pointing that out.
 
You're not an idiot at all. In fact, it'd be wonderful if every student was motivated to sit down and just explore math the way you just did. They'd learn so much more.

- Warren
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K