Do numbers derived from successive differences have a name?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ktoz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical properties of successive differences derived from a set of numbers, specifically exploring whether the final value obtained from these differences has a specific name. Participants also touch on related concepts such as polynomial fitting and the implications of these differences in the context of neural networks and finite differences.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant introduces the concept of a 'root differential' for the final value derived from successive differences but is unsure if this term is widely recognized.
  • Another participant notes that the differences resemble discrete derivatives and can be used to deduce polynomials that fit the original series.
  • Some participants suggest that the term 'iterated difference' may be more appropriate than 'root differential' due to the nature of the operation involved.
  • There is mention of the term "prime gaps" in relation to differences between successive primes, with a suggestion that 'root gap' could be a less confusing alternative.
  • One participant discusses the properties of power series and how they lead to a difference of zero for higher powers, indicating a pattern in the differences derived from powers of integers.
  • Another participant questions the necessity of forcing the first digit to 1 in their calculations and reflects on the implications of this choice.
  • A later reply connects the discussion to the Calculus of Finite Differences, explaining that reaching a constant difference allows for the derivation of a closed-form expression for summing the series.
  • One participant raises a question about whether the factorial sequence eventually flattens out to a zero difference.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the terminology used to describe the final value from successive differences, with no consensus reached on a specific name. The discussion also includes various interpretations of the mathematical implications of these differences, indicating multiple competing views.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on the number of elements in the original sequence and the unresolved nature of the mathematical terms being discussed. The relationship between these differences and polynomial expressions remains an area of exploration without definitive conclusions.

ktoz
Messages
170
Reaction score
12
Hi

I was playing around with various sets of numbers while thinking about optimizing neural networks and was wondering if numbers derived as below have a specific name

given a set: [7, 5, 3, 8, 1, 5]
the difference set is [-2, -2, 5, -7, 4]
the difference set for that is [0, 7, -12, 11]
the difference set for that is [7, -19, 23]
the difference set for that is [-26, 42]
the difference set for that is [68]

What is the mathematical term/name for '68' in this construct? I'm calling it the 'root differential' , but was sure somebody has already come up with one.

As a sort of side note, I found that the count of these roots can be found with the following

For integer sets of width W > 0 and max value W, there are a finite number of unique 'roots' which can be found by: roots = (w - 1) * 2^(w - 1) + 1 (Cullen numbers)

For integer sets of width W > 0 and max value M there are a finite number of unique 'roots' which can be found by: roots = (w - 1) * 2^(M - 1) + 1 (Proth numbers)

I'm mostly interested in the correct name for my 'root differentials'.

Thanks for any help
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I played around with those exact sets when I was a teenager. To my knowledge, they have no name.
The difference are like discrete derivatives. And I could use them to deduce polynomials to fit the original series.

For examples:

N^3 series:
0 1 8 27 64 125
1 7 19 37 61
6 12 18 24
6 6 6
0 0
0
Taking only the first column: 0 1 6 6 0 0

N^4 series:
0 1 16 81 256 625
1 15 65 175 369
14 50 110 194
36 60 84
24 24
0
Taking only the first column: 0 1 14 36 24 0

So if you have (N^4)/3 + (N^3) you will end up with this first column:
(0 1 14 36 24 0)/2 + 0 1 6 6 0 0
which will be: ...12 0
compare N^4: ... 24 0
So subtract out the N^4/2 part and you get:
0 1 6 6 0 0 (the N^3) term.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
ktoz said:
Hi

I was playing around with various sets of numbers while thinking about optimizing neural networks and was wondering if numbers derived as below have a specific name

given a set: [7, 5, 3, 8, 1, 5]
the difference set is [-2, -2, 5, -7, 4]
the difference set for that is [0, 7, -12, 11]
the difference set for that is [7, -19, 23]
the difference set for that is [-26, 42]
the difference set for that is [68]

What is the mathematical term/name for '68' in this construct? I'm calling it the 'root differential' , but was sure somebody has already come up with one.

As a sort of side note, I found that the count of these roots can be found with the following

For integer sets of width W > 0 and max value W, there are a finite number of unique 'roots' which can be found by: roots = (w - 1) * 2^(w - 1) + 1 (Cullen numbers)

For integer sets of width W > 0 and max value M there are a finite number of unique 'roots' which can be found by: roots = (w - 1) * 2^(M - 1) + 1 (Proth numbers)

I'm mostly interested in the correct name for my 'root differentials'.

Thanks for any help
Not sure about the English term. In my language it's called (iterated) sequence of differences. Although there is a connection to derivatives and especially differential equations, I think the term root differential is problematic. Firstly, the depth and thus the root depend in general on the given number of elements in the original sequence and secondly, it is not really a differential. It's an iterated difference.
 
fresh_42 said:
Firstly, the depth and thus the root depend in general on the given number of elements in the original sequence and secondly, it is not really a differential. It's an iterated difference.

I've seen elsewhere the term "prime gaps' to describe the set of differences between successive primes, so perhaps 'root gap' would avoid any confusion with current usage of 'differential'.
 
.Scott said:
So if you have (N^4)/3 + (N^3) you will end up with this first column:
(0 1 14 36 24 0)/2 + 0 1 6 6 0 0
which will be: ...12 0
compare N^4: ... 24 0
So subtract out the N^4/2 part and you get:
0 1 6 6 0 0 (the N^3) term.

Another sort of interesting thing about power series is that if you go the other way, you end up with Euler triangular numbers followed by difference of zero for every value V > P
for example:

Powers of 3
1 8 27 64 125 216
1 7 19 37 61 91
1 6 12 18 24 30
1 5 6 6 6 6
1 4 1 0 0 0

Powers of 4
1 16 81 256 625 1296
1 15 65 175 369 671
1 14 50 110 194 302
1 13 36 60 84 108
1 12 24 24 24 24
1 11 12 0 0 0

Powers of 5
1 32 243 1024 3125 7776
1 31 211 781 2101 4651
1 30 180 570 1320 2550
1 29 150 390 750 1230
1 28 121 240 360 480
1 27 94 119 120 120
1 26 67 25 1 0

Never bothered to take it any further, but it seemed interesting that no matter how large successive powers get, it always reduces to a difference of zero for n > p
 
ktoz said:
Powers of 3
1 8 27 64 125 216
1 7 19 37 61 91
1 6 12 18 24 30
1 5 6 6 6 6
1 4 1 0 0 0
I did the power of 3 and 4 in my previous post.
All you are doing here is forcing that first digit to 1. If you don't do that, it looks like this.
1 8 27 64 125 216
7 19 37 61 91
6 12 18 24
6 6 6 6
0 0 0

If you extend it, it looks like this:
-8 -1 0 1 8 27 64 125 216 343
7 1 1 7 19 37 61 91 127
-6 0 6 12 18 24 30 36
6 6 6 6 6 6 6
0 0 0 0 0 0

Notice that the 4th row should always be all sixes - and that the 5th an following rows are always all zeros.
Your 1 5 6 6 6 ... is just an artifact of forcing column 1 to all ones.

And if you do that, you get:
1 0 ...
1 -1 0 ...
1 -2 1 0 ...
1 -3 3 -1 0 ...
1 -4 6 -4 1 0 ...
 
.Scott said:
I did the power of 3 and 4 in my previous post.
All you are doing here is forcing that first digit to 1. If you don't do that, it looks like this.

So you did. Oops.
I “discovered” that thing about powers years ago and forget now why I was adding the “1” to each line, but I’m sure it was an excellent reason.
: )

Thanks for your replies.
 
ktoz said:
What is the mathematical term/name for '68' in this construct? I'm calling it the 'root differential' , but was sure somebody has already come up with one.

The calculations you illustrate are part of the subject matter of The Calculus Of Finite Differences.

If we take successive differences of a series, we may or may not eventually reach a difference that is constant. In the event we reach a difference that is constant, then we can find a closed form expression for summing the series. This is analogous to the situation in (ordinary) Calculus where if we know a higher derivative of a function is a constant then we can express the function as a polynomial.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS
1 2 6 24 120 720 5040 40320 362880 3628800 39916800 479001600 6227020800 87178291200 1307674368000 20922789888000 355687428096000 6402373705728000 121645100408832000 2432902008176640000 51090942171709440000...

1*2=2, 2*3=6, 6*4=24, 24*5=120, 120*6=720, ...

Does this sequence itself flatten out to a zero difference? I have always wondered this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
911
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K