Didaktikogenic Physics Misconceptions

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter yenchin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the persistent misconceptions in physics education, particularly those induced by teachers and textbooks. Specific examples include the misunderstanding of the Doppler effect, where students confuse the change in loudness with frequency shift. The conversation highlights the challenges educators face in correcting these ingrained misconceptions, emphasizing the need for effective teaching strategies. The mention of radiation types (alpha, beta, gamma) further illustrates the complexity of addressing misconceptions in physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Doppler effect in sound waves
  • Familiarity with basic concepts of radiation (alpha, beta, gamma)
  • Knowledge of common physics misconceptions
  • Experience in teaching or tutoring physics concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research effective teaching strategies for addressing physics misconceptions
  • Explore interactive demonstrations for the Doppler effect
  • Study methods for assessing student understanding in physics
  • Investigate resources for correcting misconceptions in radiation topics
USEFUL FOR

Physics educators, curriculum developers, and anyone involved in teaching or learning physics concepts, particularly those focused on addressing and correcting misconceptions in the classroom.

yenchin
Messages
543
Reaction score
3
http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/scenario/miscon.htm" : Student misconceptions induced by teachers and textbooks.

Wow... how many times have those mistakes been repeated in schools?! :eek:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hah!

I can say that I am not responsible for more than one of these, and even that one is splitting hairs a bit (the alpha beta gamma radiation). I will at least begin to attach a caveat to that one next time I get to radiation.

Some students are just too thick, though. I will tell them, for example, that the Doppler effect has nothing to do with how loud the noise is, how the sound of an object does get louder if it is closer, but that is not the Doppler effect. We will spend a day or two on Doppler, including throwing a noisy ball back and forth, running past the noisy ball, deriving the formula, solving problems for the shift in frequency, repeating the definition of the Doppler effect over and over...

I get to the test, and the simple question is:
"Describe what is meant by the 'Doppler Effect' for sound, and give an example of how it might be caused." There are always a few who answer in terms of how loud the sound gets when an object gets closer.

Some misconceptions are so ingrained, it would take a wood chisel to physically remove them from their brains. And for some reason I am not allowed to do that!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
362
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 137 ·
5
Replies
137
Views
5K