Difference between dissipation,diffusion and dispersion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the differences between dissipation, diffusion, and dispersion from a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) perspective. Dissipation refers to the reduction in wave magnitude, while dispersion involves inaccuracies in wave speed propagation. The wavenumber approach reveals that central differences exhibit dispersion without dissipation, whereas first-order backward differences are highly dissipative but accurate in wave speed. High-order schemes, such as those developed by Tam and Webb, often require artificial dissipation to mitigate spurious waves.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)
  • Familiarity with Taylor Series expansions
  • Knowledge of wavenumber analysis
  • Experience with numerical differentiation techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of wavenumber analysis in CFD
  • Explore the Tam and Webb Dispersive-Reflective-Preserving (DRP) schemes
  • Learn about artificial dissipation techniques in high-order numerical methods
  • Study the effects of spatial derivatives on wave propagation
USEFUL FOR

CFD engineers, numerical analysts, and researchers focusing on wave propagation and numerical methods in fluid dynamics.

mahaesh
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Anyone help me
What is the difference between dissipation, diffusion and dispersion as CFD point of view?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
These occur typically when referring to spatial derivatives. When one expands spatial derivatives from Taylor Series expansions, one can take a wavenumber approach to looking at errors and how waves propagate.

When you do the wavenumber approach, you find that the error has a real and complex part of the solutions. The complex component controls dissipation, while the real part controls dispersion (or vice versa, can't recall 100%).

To clarify, dissipation is the function of wave dying in magnitude, while dispersion is when the speed of the propagating wave is not calculated with proper accuracy and it "lags" behind the actual function.

Doing wavenumber analysis, you find that central differences, i.e. the classic second-order difference:
\frac{ du }{ dx } = \frac{u_{i+1} - u_{i-1}}{2 \Delta x}

Have only a real component to the wavenumber error, so while they are inherently non-dissipative, they do have dispersion. Likewise one-side differences, i.e. the standard first-order backward difference:
\frac{du}{dx} = \frac{u_{i} - u_{i-1}}{\Delta x}

is purely dissipative in that it will propagate the wave at the correct speed, but it HIGHLY dissipative. When high-order schemes (see Tam and Webb DRP schemes, etc) are used, many times artificial dissipation is needed to damp spurious waves before they become problems. Schemes with orders of accuracy as high as 9th order are commonly used as artificial dissipation.
 
I have encountered a vertically oriented hydraulic cylinder that is designed to actuate and slice heavy cabling into sections with a blade. The cylinder is quite small (around 1.5 inches in diameter) and has an equally small stroke. The cylinder is single acting (i.e. it is pressurized from the bottom, and vented to atmosphere with a spring return, roughly 200lbs of force on the spring). The system operates at roughly 2500 psi. Interestingly, the cylinder has a pin that passes through its...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K