- #1

- 166

- 2

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter Tyrion101
- Start date

- #1

- 166

- 2

- #2

- 166

- 2

The rest of the title should be graphing.

- #3

Stephen Tashi

Science Advisor

- 7,674

- 1,503

If you had the points (2,2) you'd make them (-2,-2) for -f(x) and (-2,2) for f(-x) Is my understanding wrong?

If the point (2,2) is (x,f(x)) then (x, -f(x)) is the point (2,-2) and (x,f(-x)) can't be determined unless you know what f(-2) is. For example if f(x) = 2x -2, f(2) = 2 and f(-2) = -6. So (x,f(-x)) is (2,-6).

- #4

- 166

- 2

Ok, that makes more sense.

- #5

Mark44

Mentor

- 35,130

- 6,876

No.It often seems as though it's backwards from what it should be, I had understood -f(x) meant to flip x and y, from positive to negative, or vice versa,

Assuming that you have the graph of y = f(x),

1. The graph of y = -f(x) is the reflection across the x-axis of the graph of y = f(x).

2. The graph of y = f(-x) is the reflection across the y-axis of the graph of y = f(x).

3. The graph of y = -f(-x) is the reflection across the origin (that is, across both axes) of the graph of y = f(x).

If you had the point (2, 2) on the graph of f, the point (-2, -2) would be on the graph of y = -f(-x). Note the two minus signs.and f(-x) to mean you just make x negative. If you had the points (2,2) you'd make them (-2,-2) for -f(x)

and (-2,2) for f(-x) Is my understanding wrong?

Share: