Difference in flight time for two planes with different velocity profiles

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the flight times of a British Concorde (BC) and a French Concorde (FC) flying around the world, covering a distance of 40,000 km. The BC completed half its journey at 2500 km/h and the other half at 1000 km/h, resulting in a total flight time of 28 hours. In contrast, the FC spent half its flight time at 2500 km/h and the other half at 1000 km/h, achieving a total flight time of 22.9 hours. Consequently, the FC arrived first, beating the BC by 5.1 hours, contradicting the answer provided in the textbook.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts such as velocity, distance, and time.
  • Familiarity with the formula V = d/t for calculating time based on distance and velocity.
  • Knowledge of average speed calculations and their application in real-world scenarios.
  • Basic problem-solving skills in mathematical contexts.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of average speed and how to apply them in various contexts.
  • Explore more complex physics problems involving variable speeds and time calculations.
  • Learn about the historical performance and specifications of the Concorde aircraft.
  • Investigate common errors in physics textbooks and how to verify solutions independently.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching motion and speed concepts, and anyone interested in aviation performance comparisons.

novae
Messages
15
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


** sorry, answer in the book doesn't make sense **
A british concord and a French concord flew in opposite directions around the world, a distance of 40K km. The BC covered half its distance at 2500 km/h, and the other half at 1000km/h. The FC spent half its flight time at 2500 km/h and the other half at 1000 km/h. Which concorde completed the trip first and by how many hours did it beat the oher?

Homework Equations


V= d/t.

The Attempt at a Solution


Time for BC [/B]
20 000km /t = 2500
t= 20 000/2500
t= 8 hours
20 000km/1000=t
20 hrs = t
Total time = 28 hours

Time for FC
40 000 = 2500 (t/2) + 1000 (t/2)
40 000 = 3500 (t/2)
(40 000/3500)2= t
22.9 hours =t

Looking at this, the french concorde got there first and beat the British concord by 5.1 hours. At the back, the difference I got is correct, it is 5.1 hours, but it says the British concord got there first. How? The BC trip was 28 hours, the FC trip was 22.9 unless I did something wrong ?

*I'm sorry this is probably a dumb question, but I don't remember if my teacher said the answer at the back was incorrect or not, so this is me reconfirming my assumption that the book is wrong *
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like the book is wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: novae
Your answer looks ok to me.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: novae

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
21K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
19K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
24K
Replies
2
Views
22K