Graduate Different symmetries or no symmetries in string theory?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of different symmetries in string theory and M theory, as highlighted in the book "A Fortunate Universe" by Geraint Lewis and Luke Barnes. The authors suggest that universes with varying symmetries could lead to distinct conservation laws, such as electric charge not being conserved. Mr. Lewis elaborates that manipulating dimensions in mathematical models can yield these hypothetical universes, which may exhibit different physical laws. Additionally, Kurt Sundermeyer’s "Symmetries in Fundamental Physics" indicates that string theories in 10 dimensions may vibrate with symmetries, but compactification could result in worlds devoid of symmetries.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of string theory and M theory concepts
  • Familiarity with conservation laws in physics
  • Knowledge of dimensional manipulation in theoretical physics
  • Basic comprehension of vacuum states in string theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "String Theory Compactification" for insights on dimensional reduction
  • Explore "M Theory" to understand its implications on fundamental symmetries
  • Study "Bubble Theory" and its relation to cosmological inflation
  • Investigate "Conservation Laws in Physics" to grasp their significance in different symmetries
USEFUL FOR

The discussion benefits theoretical physicists, cosmologists, and students interested in advanced concepts of string theory and the implications of symmetry in fundamental physics.

Suekdccia
Messages
352
Reaction score
30
TL;DR
Does string theory permit fundamental symmetries to change between universes?
I was reading the book "A Fortunate Universe" by Geraint Lewis and Luke Barnes and something caught my attention:

At page 195 the authors say that universes with different symmetries could be modeled and they would have dramatic results like having different conservation laws.

I asked Mr. Lewis if he could give me more information about this and he told me this:

"We can play with equations and add or subtract dimensions in our universe – like adding another time dimension to relativity. These other hypothetical universes could have different symmetries, so things like electric charge might not be conserved, while kinetic energy is. This would give very different physical outcomes. And yes, we could get very different physical laws with interactions that we just don’t see in our universe"

He mentioned that these universes with different symmetries and non-conserved quantities would be the result of "playing" with the dimensions of mathematical models of universes. This reminds me a lot to what happens in String Theory compactification or in M Theory. And also, at another book by Kurt Sundermeyer called "Symmetries in Fundamental Physics", he says at page 466:

"It is an astounding state of affairs that string theories in 10 dimensions vibrate with symmetries, but that after compactification we may get into worlds with no symmetries at all"

I have always read that in string theory landscape the different vacua would have the same symmetries but they would be broken differently, or at least that is what I have understood until now. But I have never read anything about vacua with different fundamental symmetries in string theory.

Therefore, does String Theory or M Theory propose that these universes with very different fundamental symmetries may exist? Do any of these theories speculate that universes with different kinds of symmetries (different global symmetries, local symmetries, gauge symmetries...etc) may exist?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suekdccia said:
Summary:: Does string theory permit fundamental symmetries to change between universes?

I was reading the book "A Fortunate Universe" by Geraint Lewis and Luke Barnes and something caught my attention:

At page 195 the authors say that universes with different symmetries could be modeled and they would have dramatic results like having different conservation laws.

I asked Mr. Lewis if he could give me more information about this and he told me this:

"We can play with equations and add or subtract dimensions in our universe – like adding another time dimension to relativity. These other hypothetical universes could have different symmetries, so things like electric charge might not be conserved, while kinetic energy is. This would give very different physical outcomes. And yes, we could get very different physical laws with interactions that we just don’t see in our universe"

He mentioned that these universes with different symmetries and non-conserved quantities would be the result of "playing" with the dimensions of mathematical models of universes. This reminds me a lot to what happens in String Theory compactification or in M Theory.And also, at another book by Kurt Sundermeyer called "Symmetries in Fundamental Physics", he says at page 466:

"It is an astounding state of affairs that string theories in 10 dimensions vibrate with symmetries, but that after compactification we may get into worlds with no symmetries at all"

I have always read that in string theory landscape the different vacua would have the same symmetries but they would be broken differently, or at least that is what I have understood until now. But I have never read anything about vacua with different fundamental symmetries in string theory.

Therefore, does String Theory or M Theory propose that these universes with very different fundamental symmetries may exist? Do any of these theories speculate that universes with different kinds of symmetries (different global symmetries, local symmetries, gauge symmetries...etc) may exist?

Things like bubble theory and string theory do propose different symmetries but I am unsure about M theory.
 
CallMeDirac said:
Things like bubble theory and string theory do propose different symmetries but I am unsure about M theory.

What is bubble theory? Cosmological inflation?

But if these propose that vacua would have different symmetries, wouldn't that mean that they woulf be governed by different fundamental laws of physics?
 
Suekdccia said:
What is bubble theory? Cosmological inflation?

But if these propose that vacua would have different symmetries, wouldn't that mean that they woulf be governed by different fundamental laws of physics?

Yes, each bubble is its own universe and is dictated by its own laws of physics.
 
But the thing is that in string theory, as far as I understand it, different vacua would have different laws of low-energy physics while the laws at high energies would all stay the same. If the fundamental symmetries would change between vacua (therefore showing different conservation laws for example, as Geraint Lewis told me) wouldn't that mean that the very fundamental laws of high energy physics would also change?
 
"Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.15143 The paper claims: We compare the standard homogeneous cosmological model, i.e., spatially flat ΛCDM, and the timescape cosmology which invokes backreaction of inhomogeneities. Timescape, while statistically homogeneous and isotropic, departs from average Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker evolution, and replaces dark energy by kinetic gravitational energy and its gradients, in explaining...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K